Comparison Overview

Corporate Benefits Alliance

VS

Allied Administrators

Corporate Benefits Alliance

23123 Ventura Blvd, Woodland Hills, California, 91364, US
Last Update: 2026-01-23

Corporate Benefits Alliance is a market leader in the quest to make healthcare costs and medical insurance financially transparent. Companies have a right to know where their healthcare dollars go, and the answer might surprise you. CBA has recently launched a NextGen Level Funded PPO plan that utilizes one of the nation's largest and most trusted PPO networks. The plan, ProVision has embedded a proprietary adjudication model for high-dollar facility claims that saves plan sponsors 25%, on average, of their total annual healthcare spend. Unlike the systemic problems inherent in reference-based pricing plans, CBA’s ProVision plan has a single point of access for all healthcare and no chance of balance billing to the employees. Basically, it’s the same plan as you have now, just 25% less than what you currently pay.

NAICS: 524
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 8
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Allied Administrators

501 14th St, 200, Oakland, California, US, 94612
Last Update: 2026-01-23

At Allied Administrators, we specialize in providing customized benefits solutions for the small group market across the United States. As a trusted third-party administrator (TPA), we bring decades of industry expertise and a deep understanding of the unique challenges small businesses face. We know that every client is different—there’s no one-size-fits-all solution when it comes to employee benefits. Our dedicated, responsive team is committed to building long-lasting partnerships through reliable service and personalized support. We pride ourselves on delivering fast, effective solutions while maintaining the highest standards of professionalism and care. When you partner with Allied Administrators, you're choosing a TPA that puts your needs first—every time.

NAICS: 52421
NAICS Definition: Insurance Agencies and Brokerages
Employees: 35
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/corporatebenefitsauthority.jpeg
Corporate Benefits Alliance
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/alliedadministrators.jpeg
Allied Administrators
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Corporate Benefits Alliance
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Allied Administrators
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Insurance Agencies and Brokerages Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Corporate Benefits Alliance in 2026.

Incidents vs Insurance Agencies and Brokerages Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Allied Administrators in 2026.

Incident History — Corporate Benefits Alliance (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Corporate Benefits Alliance cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Allied Administrators (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Allied Administrators cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/corporatebenefitsauthority.jpeg
Corporate Benefits Alliance
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/alliedadministrators.jpeg
Allied Administrators
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Allied Administrators company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Corporate Benefits Alliance company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Allied Administrators company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Corporate Benefits Alliance company.

In the current year, Allied Administrators company and Corporate Benefits Alliance company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Allied Administrators company nor Corporate Benefits Alliance company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Allied Administrators company nor Corporate Benefits Alliance company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Allied Administrators company nor Corporate Benefits Alliance company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Corporate Benefits Alliance company nor Allied Administrators company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Corporate Benefits Alliance nor Allied Administrators holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Corporate Benefits Alliance company nor Allied Administrators company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Allied Administrators company employs more people globally than Corporate Benefits Alliance company, reflecting its scale as a Insurance Agencies and Brokerages.

Neither Corporate Benefits Alliance nor Allied Administrators holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Corporate Benefits Alliance nor Allied Administrators holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Corporate Benefits Alliance nor Allied Administrators holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Corporate Benefits Alliance nor Allied Administrators holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Corporate Benefits Alliance nor Allied Administrators holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Corporate Benefits Alliance nor Allied Administrators holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H