Comparison Overview

Corporate Concepts Inc.

VS

VSMG

Corporate Concepts Inc.

None
Last Update: 2026-01-23
Between 750 and 799

Corporate Concepts Inc is a highly successful, 47-year-old family-owned and operated independent Minnesota Healthcare Brokerage business. Ellen Bonewell, the second-generation owner, leads Corporate Concepts Inc, which has been serving MN since its establishment in 1976 and continues to grow steadily. Our company's growth has been driven by the trust and referrals of 1000s of satisfied clients. We have built a strong reputation over the past 47 years, providing exceptional service to the people of Minnesota. We understand the frustration, confusion, and time-consuming nature of dealing with the documentation associated with insurance planning. That's why at Corporate Concepts, we strive to take the frustrations and confusion out of the equation. Our aim is to instill confidence and understanding in our clients, ensuring they have made the right choice. Building long-term relationships is a fundamental aspect of our success. By getting to know our clients, their businesses and employees, individuals and their families, and seniors age 65 and older, we can ensure they have the appropriate coverage that meets their specific needs. We take great pride in providing the best service in Minnesota. We fully assume the responsibility of getting you the right employer group plan, individual-family plan, or Medicare plan you require. Our highly educated, certified, and qualified brokerage team members will work tirelessly with you to ensure you have confidence in your decision and that you pay the least amount of money possible. As a quality control measure, the owner, with 33 years of experience, reviews 100% of all plans before our clients sign the agreement. Once you become a client of Corporate Concepts you can move forward with confidence, knowing that we will be here for you 24/7, year after year. We are committed to our clients and are here to stay. Contact us for a free consultation. We are here to assist you in making the best decisions for your insurance needs.

NAICS: 52421
NAICS Definition: Insurance Agencies and Brokerages
Employees: None
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

VSMG

PO Box 41760, Phoenix, AZ, 85080-1760, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

Built by and for Arizona public sector employers, VSMG is a leading employee benefits consultant, dedicated exclusively to serving the needs of Arizona’s school districts, municipalities, and other public entities for over 19 years. With offices in Phoenix and in Tucson, we are committed to delivering expert advice, forward-thinking strategies, and cost-effective solutions to help clients attract and retain employees. Want to know more? Visit our website at vsmg.org, or speak to us directly at (623) 594-4370.

NAICS: 524
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 32
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/corporate-concepts-inc.jpeg
Corporate Concepts Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/valley-schools-insurance-trust.jpeg
VSMG
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Corporate Concepts Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
VSMG
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Insurance Agencies and Brokerages Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Corporate Concepts Inc. in 2026.

Incidents vs Insurance Agencies and Brokerages Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for VSMG in 2026.

Incident History — Corporate Concepts Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Corporate Concepts Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — VSMG (X = Date, Y = Severity)

VSMG cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/corporate-concepts-inc.jpeg
Corporate Concepts Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/valley-schools-insurance-trust.jpeg
VSMG
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Corporate Concepts Inc. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to VSMG company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, VSMG company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Corporate Concepts Inc. company.

In the current year, VSMG company and Corporate Concepts Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither VSMG company nor Corporate Concepts Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither VSMG company nor Corporate Concepts Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither VSMG company nor Corporate Concepts Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Corporate Concepts Inc. company nor VSMG company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Corporate Concepts Inc. nor VSMG holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Corporate Concepts Inc. company nor VSMG company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Neither Corporate Concepts Inc. nor VSMG holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Corporate Concepts Inc. nor VSMG holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Corporate Concepts Inc. nor VSMG holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Corporate Concepts Inc. nor VSMG holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Corporate Concepts Inc. nor VSMG holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Corporate Concepts Inc. nor VSMG holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N