Comparison Overview

Corporación América

VS

World Health Organization

Corporación América

Honduras 5663 Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires (C1414BNE), AR
Last Update: 2025-11-27

Fundado por Eduardo Eurnekian, el holding de empresas Corporación América viene invirtiendo en diversas industrias: desde la operación aeroportuaria, pasando por la producción y transporte de energía, la minería, la agroindustria, la producción de vinos, la construcción e infraestructura, los servicios bancarios y el real estate, hasta el armado de tarjetas inteligentes. Nacido en Argentina, el grupo Corporación América se ha expandido en Latinoamérica con inversiones en Uruguay, Brasil y Ecuador, como también en Europa, con empresas en Italia y Armenia. Desde 2018, su división aeroportuaria, Corporación América Airports (NYSE:CAAP) cotiza en la Bolsa de Nueva York.

NAICS: 92812
NAICS Definition: International Affairs
Employees: 5,001-10,000
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

World Health Organization

20, avenue Appia, Geneva 27, GE, CH, 1211
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 800 and 849

The World Health Organization's mission: to promote health, keep the world safe, and serve the vulnerable. Working through offices in more than 150 countries, WHO staff work side by side with governments and other partners to ensure the highest attainable level of health for all people. Stay connected with WHO: Facebook https://www.facebook.com/WHO Twitter http://www.twitter.com/who Instagram: @who Google+ https://www.google.com/+who YouTube http://www.youtube.com/who

NAICS: 92812
NAICS Definition: International Affairs
Employees: 30,615
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
2

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/corporacion-america.jpeg
Corporación América
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/world-health-organization.jpeg
World Health Organization
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Corporación América
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
World Health Organization
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs International Affairs Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Corporación América in 2025.

Incidents vs International Affairs Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for World Health Organization in 2025.

Incident History — Corporación América (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Corporación América cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — World Health Organization (X = Date, Y = Severity)

World Health Organization cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/corporacion-america.jpeg
Corporación América
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/world-health-organization.jpeg
World Health Organization
Incidents

Date Detected: 3/2020
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Phishing
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 6/2018
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: Initial Access
Motivation: Financial Gain, Data Theft
Blog: Blog

FAQ

World Health Organization company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Corporación América company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

World Health Organization company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Corporación América company has not reported any.

In the current year, World Health Organization company and Corporación América company have not reported any cyber incidents.

World Health Organization company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Corporación América company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither World Health Organization company nor Corporación América company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

World Health Organization company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Corporación América company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Corporación América company nor World Health Organization company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Corporación América nor World Health Organization holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Corporación América company nor World Health Organization company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Neither Corporación América nor World Health Organization holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Corporación América nor World Health Organization holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Corporación América nor World Health Organization holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Corporación América nor World Health Organization holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Corporación América nor World Health Organization holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Corporación América nor World Health Organization holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H