Comparison Overview

Coronado Binding Systems

VS

Evan Evans

Coronado Binding Systems

None
Last Update: 2025-12-17

Coronado Binding Systems is a family owned and operated business since 1977, specializing in custom presentation products! Our office headquarters are located in Olathe, Kansas, in a 30,000 square foot office and warehouse facility. We also have a branch office location in St. Louis, Missouri that is comprised of a 5,000 square foot space, housing warehouse and meeting areas. Our Promise Coronado Binding Systems is committed to providing our customers quality presentation products, binding equipment and supplies. It is our promise to give you the quality and craftsmanship you demand, as well as affordable prices. Without you, our customers, we cannot function as a business. For this reason we strive to provide our customers with great and friendly customer service every time you work with a Coronado Binding Systems representative.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Evan Evans

4 Guilfoyle Av, Coburg North, Victoria, 3058, AU
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

Australia's leading digital printer of fabric display banners and flags, Evan Evan’s single-minded focus is to provide you with practical display solutions that make your message stand out. Service quality, innovation and solutions tailored to your needs is said by many and delivered by few. Evan Evans is one of the few. We don’t make statements we can’t back up. So call and us and put us to the test. Flags, banners and bunting – standard or hand-made, you decide the size Display images – from huge to small, on almost any material Display systems – one or many, portable or static Murals, window displays, light boxes, floor signage – total flexibility Display strategy, design, production, maintenance – your needs covered nationally Global experience, local knowledge – effective solutions Buy on-line or we’ll serve you – you choose Evan Evans provides some of the hardest-working and most cost-effective solutions to meet your display requirements. How? Apart from our team of experienced industry experts, we continually invest in equipment, processes, R&D and strategic partnerships globally to remain ahead of our competitors. And that means you benefit with cutting edge solutions. Creative Design: Working closely with you to get a strong understanding of your communication objectives, your target market, your budget and any environmental considerations, we’ll conceptualise display applications that ensure your brand or message stands out and gets noticed.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 14
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/coronado-binding-systems.jpeg
Coronado Binding Systems
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/evan-evans.jpeg
Evan Evans
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Coronado Binding Systems
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Evan Evans
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Coronado Binding Systems in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Evan Evans in 2025.

Incident History — Coronado Binding Systems (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Coronado Binding Systems cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Evan Evans (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Evan Evans cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/coronado-binding-systems.jpeg
Coronado Binding Systems
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/evan-evans.jpeg
Evan Evans
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Coronado Binding Systems company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Evan Evans company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Evan Evans company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Coronado Binding Systems company.

In the current year, Evan Evans company and Coronado Binding Systems company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Evan Evans company nor Coronado Binding Systems company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Evan Evans company nor Coronado Binding Systems company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Evan Evans company nor Coronado Binding Systems company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Coronado Binding Systems company nor Evan Evans company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Coronado Binding Systems nor Evan Evans holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Coronado Binding Systems company nor Evan Evans company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Evan Evans company employs more people globally than Coronado Binding Systems company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Coronado Binding Systems nor Evan Evans holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Coronado Binding Systems nor Evan Evans holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Coronado Binding Systems nor Evan Evans holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Coronado Binding Systems nor Evan Evans holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Coronado Binding Systems nor Evan Evans holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Coronado Binding Systems nor Evan Evans holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N