Comparison Overview

Cornell University

VS

Washington University in St. Louis

Cornell University

Day Hall, Ithaca, NY, 14853, US
Last Update: 2026-01-17
View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.cornell.edu/

Cornell is a privately endowed research university and a partner of the State University of New York. As the federal land-grant institution in New York State, we have a responsibility—unique within the Ivy League—to make contributions in all fields of knowledge in a manner that prioritizes public engagement to help improve the quality of life in our state, the nation, the world.

NAICS: 6113
NAICS Definition: Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees: 19,745
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Washington University in St. Louis

One Brookings Drive, St. Louis, mo, US, 63130-4899
Last Update: 2026-01-17
Between 750 and 799
http://washu.edu

Washington University in St. Louis, a medium-sized, independent university, is dedicated to challenging its faculty and students alike to seek new knowledge and greater understanding of an ever-changing, multicultural world. The university has played an integral role in the history and continuing growth of St. Louis and benefits in turn from the wide array of social, cultural and recreational opportunities offered by the metropolitan area to its more than 2.8 million residents. The mission of Washington University in St. Louis is the promotion of learning — learning by students and by faculty. Teaching, the transmission of knowledge, is central to our mission, as is research, the creation of new knowledge.

NAICS: 6113
NAICS Definition: Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees: 17,820
Subsidiaries: 3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cornell-university.jpeg
Cornell University
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/washington-university-in-st-louis.jpeg
Washington University in St. Louis
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Cornell University
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Washington University in St. Louis
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cornell University in 2026.

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Washington University in St. Louis in 2026.

Incident History — Cornell University (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cornell University cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Washington University in St. Louis (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Washington University in St. Louis cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cornell-university.jpeg
Cornell University
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/washington-university-in-st-louis.jpeg
Washington University in St. Louis
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Cornell University company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Washington University in St. Louis company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Washington University in St. Louis company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Cornell University company.

In the current year, Washington University in St. Louis company and Cornell University company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Washington University in St. Louis company nor Cornell University company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Washington University in St. Louis company nor Cornell University company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Washington University in St. Louis company nor Cornell University company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Cornell University company nor Washington University in St. Louis company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Cornell University nor Washington University in St. Louis holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Washington University in St. Louis company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Cornell University company.

Cornell University company employs more people globally than Washington University in St. Louis company, reflecting its scale as a Higher Education.

Neither Cornell University nor Washington University in St. Louis holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Cornell University nor Washington University in St. Louis holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Cornell University nor Washington University in St. Louis holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Cornell University nor Washington University in St. Louis holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Cornell University nor Washington University in St. Louis holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Cornell University nor Washington University in St. Louis holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References
Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References
Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References