Comparison Overview

Corgraf Gráfica e Editora Ltda.

VS

Brother Machinery (Asia) Limited

Corgraf Gráfica e Editora Ltda.

Rua Honesta de Souza Rausis, 321, Colombo, PR, 83.413-660, BR
Last Update: 2025-12-14

Fundado há mais de quarenta anos, o Grupo Corgraf solidificou-se no mercado por sua excelência em serviços gráficos de qualidade. Devido a exigência do mercado, nos tornamos diligentes quanto à capacidade gráfica e o compromisso ético, itens fundamentais em qualquer prestação de serviço, o Grupo Corgraf ampliou sua infra-estrutura e se preparou para acompanhar a evolução do mundo empreendedor e estar cada vez mais inserido neste panorama de evolução da Indústria Gráfica, do promocional a embalagens. A Corgraf está a frente do seu tempo e tem toda a tecnologia para produzir seu impresso com excelência.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 84
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Brother Machinery (Asia) Limited

17/F, Fugro House – KCC 2, No.1 Kwai On Road, Kwai Chung, , New Territories, Hong Kong SAR, undefined, HK
Last Update: 2025-12-17

Brother Machinery (Asia) Limited is located in Hong Kong, 100% owned by Brother Industries, Ltd. located in Japan. Brother Machinery (Asia) is responsible for the Garment printer business in the Asia region. Brother is in the Direct to Garment printing market since 1999 and going strong. We have our in-house developed printhead, ink and Machine which is manufactured in Japan. Brother is into Manufacturing of Next Generation Decorating Technology for High volume printing in Direct to Garment Textile Market. We are also proud to introduce Innobela Textile inks which are genuine consumables offered by Brother as they offer Print Longevity, Richer Colors and Sharper Images.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 25
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/corgraf-gr-fica-e-editora.jpeg
Corgraf Gráfica e Editora Ltda.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/brother-machinery-asia.jpeg
Brother Machinery (Asia) Limited
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Corgraf Gráfica e Editora Ltda.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Brother Machinery (Asia) Limited
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Corgraf Gráfica e Editora Ltda. in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Brother Machinery (Asia) Limited in 2025.

Incident History — Corgraf Gráfica e Editora Ltda. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Corgraf Gráfica e Editora Ltda. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Brother Machinery (Asia) Limited (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Brother Machinery (Asia) Limited cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/corgraf-gr-fica-e-editora.jpeg
Corgraf Gráfica e Editora Ltda.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/brother-machinery-asia.jpeg
Brother Machinery (Asia) Limited
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2025
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Unauthenticated Remote Code Execution (RCE)
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Corgraf Gráfica e Editora Ltda. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Brother Machinery (Asia) Limited company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Brother Machinery (Asia) Limited company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Corgraf Gráfica e Editora Ltda. company has not reported any.

In the current year, Brother Machinery (Asia) Limited company has reported more cyber incidents than Corgraf Gráfica e Editora Ltda. company.

Neither Brother Machinery (Asia) Limited company nor Corgraf Gráfica e Editora Ltda. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Brother Machinery (Asia) Limited company nor Corgraf Gráfica e Editora Ltda. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Brother Machinery (Asia) Limited company nor Corgraf Gráfica e Editora Ltda. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Brother Machinery (Asia) Limited company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while Corgraf Gráfica e Editora Ltda. company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Corgraf Gráfica e Editora Ltda. nor Brother Machinery (Asia) Limited holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Brother Machinery (Asia) Limited company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Corgraf Gráfica e Editora Ltda. company.

Corgraf Gráfica e Editora Ltda. company employs more people globally than Brother Machinery (Asia) Limited company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Corgraf Gráfica e Editora Ltda. nor Brother Machinery (Asia) Limited holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Corgraf Gráfica e Editora Ltda. nor Brother Machinery (Asia) Limited holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Corgraf Gráfica e Editora Ltda. nor Brother Machinery (Asia) Limited holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Corgraf Gráfica e Editora Ltda. nor Brother Machinery (Asia) Limited holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Corgraf Gráfica e Editora Ltda. nor Brother Machinery (Asia) Limited holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Corgraf Gráfica e Editora Ltda. nor Brother Machinery (Asia) Limited holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N