Comparison Overview

Core Color

VS

Southwest Binding & Laminating

Core Color

535 Andrewds Road, Trevose, PA, 19053, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.corecolorgraphics.com

Core Color Graphics is a Professional Printer and Manufacturer. We offer full service in house printing with 5 (five) presses including Offset, Digital & Large Format. As a "full service solutions provider"​ with over (40) forty years of printing and production experience and expertise. We provide solutions! for Brochures, Posters, Point of purchase, Rigid Displays, Booklets, Catalogs, Packaging and perfect bound booklets and more... Other in-house services include Direct Mail, List Procurement, Graphic Design We make the "Whole Print Buying Experience"​ Easy so call 215-485-5209 or email today [email protected] to get your next project moving in the right direction from start to finish.Core offers an Extreme Selection:

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Southwest Binding & Laminating

109 Millwell Ct., None, Maryland Heights, MO, US, 63043
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 650 and 699
http://www.swbindinglaminating.com

Welcome to Southwest Binding & Laminating Your home for the best in presentation, binding, shrink wrapping, laminating supplies and equipment. When you need to make information "presentable" whether a sales pitch, classroom handouts, corporate materials or family photos, Southwest Binding & Laminating can help you not only with what you need but how to do it! For industry-specific needs, click on the applicable button to the right. For general information on how to laminate or choose the right binding system for you, explore our vast knowledge base of instructional videos, web pages and FAQs.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 45
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/core-color-graphics.jpeg
Core Color
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/southwest-binding-&-laminating.jpeg
Southwest Binding & Laminating
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Core Color
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Southwest Binding & Laminating
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Core Color in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Southwest Binding & Laminating in 2025.

Incident History — Core Color (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Core Color cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Southwest Binding & Laminating (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Southwest Binding & Laminating cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/core-color-graphics.jpeg
Core Color
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/southwest-binding-&-laminating.jpeg
Southwest Binding & Laminating
Incidents

Date Detected: 1/2024
Type:Ransomware
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Core Color company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Southwest Binding & Laminating company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Southwest Binding & Laminating company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Core Color company has not reported any.

In the current year, Southwest Binding & Laminating company and Core Color company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Southwest Binding & Laminating company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Core Color company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Southwest Binding & Laminating company nor Core Color company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Southwest Binding & Laminating company nor Core Color company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Core Color company nor Southwest Binding & Laminating company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Core Color nor Southwest Binding & Laminating holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Core Color company nor Southwest Binding & Laminating company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Southwest Binding & Laminating company employs more people globally than Core Color company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Core Color nor Southwest Binding & Laminating holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Core Color nor Southwest Binding & Laminating holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Core Color nor Southwest Binding & Laminating holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Core Color nor Southwest Binding & Laminating holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Core Color nor Southwest Binding & Laminating holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Core Color nor Southwest Binding & Laminating holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References