Comparison Overview

Coral Gables Museum

VS

Oslo Museum

Coral Gables Museum

285 Aragon Avenue, Coral Gables, Florida, 33134, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22

The Museum’s mission is to celebrate, investigate and explore the civic arts of architecture and urban and environmental design, and the visual arts, including fostering an appreciation for the history, vision, and cultural landscape of Coral Gables; promoting beauty and planning as well as historic, artistic and environmental preservation for a broad audience, including children, families, and community members, as well as local, regional, national and international visitors. The Museum optimizes its mission by cultivating effective partnerships, and providing programming that includes exhibitions, collections, educational offerings, lectures, tours, publications and special events.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 23
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Oslo Museum

Frognerveien 67, Oslo, 0257, NO
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

Stiftelsen Oslo Museum er byens eget museum, og bidrar til kunnskap om og forankring i Oslo-samfunnet. Museet forvalter, formidler og forsker i Oslos historie, teaterhistorie og nyere innvandringshistorie. Museet har en aktiv formidlingsprofil og tilhold på flere steder i Oslo; Bymuseet og Teatermuseet i Frognerparken, Interkulturelt Museum på Grønland og Arbeidermuseet på Sagene. Oslo Museum ble i 2019 kåret til «Årets museum» av Norges Museumsforbund, med begrunnelse i museets mangfoldsprofil og nyskapende formidlings- og utstillingsarbeid. Museet forvalter en av landets største fotosamlinger, har en stor samling av malerier og Oslo-portretter, og en kulturhistorisk samling som også inkluderer intervjumateriale.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 47
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/coral-gables-museum.jpeg
Coral Gables Museum
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/oslo-museum.jpeg
Oslo Museum
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Coral Gables Museum
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Oslo Museum
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Coral Gables Museum in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Oslo Museum in 2026.

Incident History — Coral Gables Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Coral Gables Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Oslo Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Oslo Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/coral-gables-museum.jpeg
Coral Gables Museum
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/oslo-museum.jpeg
Oslo Museum
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Oslo Museum company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Coral Gables Museum company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Oslo Museum company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Coral Gables Museum company.

In the current year, Oslo Museum company and Coral Gables Museum company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Oslo Museum company nor Coral Gables Museum company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Oslo Museum company nor Coral Gables Museum company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Oslo Museum company nor Coral Gables Museum company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Coral Gables Museum company nor Oslo Museum company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Coral Gables Museum nor Oslo Museum holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Coral Gables Museum company nor Oslo Museum company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Oslo Museum company employs more people globally than Coral Gables Museum company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Coral Gables Museum nor Oslo Museum holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Coral Gables Museum nor Oslo Museum holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Coral Gables Museum nor Oslo Museum holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Coral Gables Museum nor Oslo Museum holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Coral Gables Museum nor Oslo Museum holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Coral Gables Museum nor Oslo Museum holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H