Comparison Overview

Copyright Licensing Agency

VS

Seymour Distribution

Copyright Licensing Agency

1 St Katharine's Way, London, E1W 1UN, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-21
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.cla.co.uk

As a not-for-profit company, we distribute our revenues back into the creative industries helping to ensure rights holders are fairly remunerated when their works are used. CLA is recognised by the UK government as the collective management organisation for published material. We exist to support knowledge sharing, protect your company, and champion the creative ecosystem. Our revenue is distributed to our member organisations who pay royalties directly to copyright owners – authors (ALCS), publishers (PLS), and visual artists (DACS & PICSEL).

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 122
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Seymour Distribution

2 East Poultry Avenue, London, undefined, EC1A 9PT, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799
http://www.seymour.co.uk/

Seymour is part of the Frontline Group (a joint venture between Bauer, Immediate Media Company and Haymarket Publications). We have a 20% share of the total magazine market and the Frontline Group, including Seymour, has 59% share. This gives us the stability and clout to drive your magazine sales, in an increasingly volatile market place. More importantly, we have a 49% share of the 3rd party magazine market meaning that we are the preferred choice of distributor for independent magazine publishers. As well as this, Seymour is the largest distributor of UK magazines internationally, exporting magazines to over 90 countries; we are additionally the largest importer of foreign magazine titles into the UK. So, whether it be in the UK or overseas, we can help you develop your circulation strategies, to achieve your sales goals and maximise every opportunity for each of your titles. Our experience in magazine distribution, our market leading systems and market intelligence will provide you with the competitive advantage to succeed in today’s markets. We pride ourselves on our ability to adapt to an ever changing market and our bespoke solutions for clients – it’s not a ‘one size fits all’ mentality and we like it that way

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 97
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/copyright-licensing-agency.jpeg
Copyright Licensing Agency
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/seymour-distribution.jpeg
Seymour Distribution
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Copyright Licensing Agency
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Seymour Distribution
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Copyright Licensing Agency in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Seymour Distribution in 2025.

Incident History — Copyright Licensing Agency (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Copyright Licensing Agency cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Seymour Distribution (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Seymour Distribution cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/copyright-licensing-agency.jpeg
Copyright Licensing Agency
Incidents
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/seymour-distribution.jpeg
Seymour Distribution
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Seymour Distribution company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Copyright Licensing Agency company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Seymour Distribution company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Copyright Licensing Agency company.

In the current year, Seymour Distribution company and Copyright Licensing Agency company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Seymour Distribution company nor Copyright Licensing Agency company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Seymour Distribution company nor Copyright Licensing Agency company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Seymour Distribution company nor Copyright Licensing Agency company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Copyright Licensing Agency company nor Seymour Distribution company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Copyright Licensing Agency nor Seymour Distribution holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Copyright Licensing Agency company nor Seymour Distribution company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Copyright Licensing Agency company employs more people globally than Seymour Distribution company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither Copyright Licensing Agency nor Seymour Distribution holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Copyright Licensing Agency nor Seymour Distribution holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Copyright Licensing Agency nor Seymour Distribution holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Copyright Licensing Agency nor Seymour Distribution holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Copyright Licensing Agency nor Seymour Distribution holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Copyright Licensing Agency nor Seymour Distribution holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References
Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References