Comparison Overview

Copenhagen Consensus Center

VS

Smart Prosperity Institute

Copenhagen Consensus Center

None
Last Update: 2025-12-02

The Copenhagen Consensus Center is a think tank that researches and publishes the smartest solutions for the world's biggest problems by cost-benefit. Its studies are conducted by more than 100 economists from internationally renowned institutions, including seven Nobel Laureates, to advise policy-makers and philanthropists how to spend their money most effectively. The Center's advocacy for data-driven prioritization was voted into the top 20 campaigns worldwide in a think tank survey conducted by University of Pennsylvania “Copenhagen Consensus is an outstanding, visionary idea and deserves global coverage” - The Economist We work with some of the world's top economists (including 7 Nobel Laureates) to research and publish the smartest solutions to global challenges. Through social, economic and environmental benefit-cost research, we show policymakers and philanthropists how to do the most good for each dollar spent.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Smart Prosperity Institute

1 Stewart St Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, K1N 7M9, CA
Last Update: 2025-12-01

Smart Prosperity Institute is a national research network and policy think tank based at the University of Ottawa and working in close partnership with Generate Canada. We deliver world-class research and work with public and private partners – all to advance practical policies and market solutions for a stronger, cleaner economy.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 42
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/copenhagen-consensus-center.jpeg
Copenhagen Consensus Center
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sustainable-prosperity-sp-.jpeg
Smart Prosperity Institute
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Copenhagen Consensus Center
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Smart Prosperity Institute
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Copenhagen Consensus Center in 2025.

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Smart Prosperity Institute in 2025.

Incident History — Copenhagen Consensus Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Copenhagen Consensus Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Smart Prosperity Institute (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Smart Prosperity Institute cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/copenhagen-consensus-center.jpeg
Copenhagen Consensus Center
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sustainable-prosperity-sp-.jpeg
Smart Prosperity Institute
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Smart Prosperity Institute company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Copenhagen Consensus Center company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Smart Prosperity Institute company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Copenhagen Consensus Center company.

In the current year, Smart Prosperity Institute company and Copenhagen Consensus Center company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Smart Prosperity Institute company nor Copenhagen Consensus Center company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Smart Prosperity Institute company nor Copenhagen Consensus Center company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Smart Prosperity Institute company nor Copenhagen Consensus Center company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Copenhagen Consensus Center company nor Smart Prosperity Institute company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Copenhagen Consensus Center nor Smart Prosperity Institute holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Copenhagen Consensus Center company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Smart Prosperity Institute company.

Smart Prosperity Institute company employs more people globally than Copenhagen Consensus Center company, reflecting its scale as a Think Tanks.

Neither Copenhagen Consensus Center nor Smart Prosperity Institute holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Copenhagen Consensus Center nor Smart Prosperity Institute holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Copenhagen Consensus Center nor Smart Prosperity Institute holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Copenhagen Consensus Center nor Smart Prosperity Institute holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Copenhagen Consensus Center nor Smart Prosperity Institute holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Copenhagen Consensus Center nor Smart Prosperity Institute holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Sigstore Timestamp Authority is a service for issuing RFC 3161 timestamps. Prior to 2.0.3, Function api.ParseJSONRequest currently splits (via a call to strings.Split) an optionally-provided OID (which is untrusted data) on periods. Similarly, function api.getContentType splits the Content-Type header (which is also untrusted data) on an application string. As a result, in the face of a malicious request with either an excessively long OID in the payload containing many period characters or a malformed Content-Type header, a call to api.ParseJSONRequest or api.getContentType incurs allocations of O(n) bytes (where n stands for the length of the function's argument). This vulnerability is fixed in 2.0.3.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Monkeytype is a minimalistic and customizable typing test. In 25.49.0 and earlier, there is improper handling of user input which allows an attacker to execute malicious javascript on anyone viewing a malicious quote submission. quote.text and quote.source are user input, and they're inserted straight into the DOM. If they contain HTML tags, they will be rendered (after some escaping using quotes and textarea tags).

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

SysReptor is a fully customizable pentest reporting platform. Prior to 2025.102, there is a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability allows authenticated users to execute malicious JavaScript in the context of other logged-in users by uploading malicious JavaScript files in the web UI. This vulnerability is fixed in 2025.102.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Taiko Alethia is an Ethereum-equivalent, permissionless, based rollup designed to scale Ethereum without compromising its fundamental properties. In 2.3.1 and earlier, TaikoInbox._verifyBatches (packages/protocol/contracts/layer1/based/TaikoInbox.sol:627-678) advanced the local tid to whatever transition matched the current blockHash before knowing whether that batch would actually be verified. When the loop later broke (e.g., cooldown window not yet passed or transition invalidated), the function still wrote that newer tid into batches[lastVerifiedBatchId].verifiedTransitionId after decrementing batchId. Result: the last verified batch could end up pointing at a transition index from the next batch (often zeroed), corrupting the verified chain pointer.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A flaw has been found in youlaitech youlai-mall 1.0.0/2.0.0. Affected is the function getById/updateAddress/deleteAddress of the file /mall-ums/app-api/v1/addresses/. Executing manipulation can lead to improper control of dynamically-identified variables. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X