Comparison Overview

Cooper Steel

VS

Kiewit

Cooper Steel

1005 17th Ave S, Nashville, 37212, US
Last Update: 2026-01-18
Between 600 and 649

At Cooper Steel, our reputation is built on more than just our services. For more than six decades, clients have trusted us to deliver precision craftsmanship and quality throughout every project stage including estimating, fabrication, erection, project management, and detailing. With grit and determination, we tackle every project head-on, ensuring our customers' expectations are exceeded at every touchpoint.

NAICS: 23
NAICS Definition: Construction
Employees: 232
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1

Kiewit

1550 Mike Fahey St., Omaha, 68102, US
Last Update: 2026-01-17
Between 750 and 799

At Kiewit, the projects we deliver make a difference, and we offer opportunities for you to make one, too. Our construction and engineering professionals work on some of the industry’s most complex, challenging and rewarding projects – whether it’s boring tunnels through mountains, turning rivers into energy, or building bridges that connect communities. Kiewit people tackle important projects of every size, in any market. Start your Kiewit adventure today at kiewitjobs.com. Kiewit is one of North America’s largest and most respected construction and engineering organizations. With its roots dating back to 1884, the employee-owned organization operates through a network of subsidiaries in the United States, Canada, and Mexico. Kiewit offers construction and engineering services in a variety of markets including transportation; oil, gas and chemical; power; building; marine; water/wastewater; industrial; and mining. We are an Equal Opportunity Employer. Employment decisions are made without regard to race, color, religion, national or ethnic origin, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity or expression, age, disability, protected veteran status or other characteristics protected by law.

NAICS: 23
NAICS Definition: Construction
Employees: 25,093
Subsidiaries: 6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cooper-steel-usa.jpeg
Cooper Steel
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kiewit.jpeg
Kiewit
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Cooper Steel
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Kiewit
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Construction Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cooper Steel in 2026.

Incidents vs Construction Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Kiewit in 2026.

Incident History — Cooper Steel (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cooper Steel cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Kiewit (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Kiewit cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cooper-steel-usa.jpeg
Cooper Steel
Incidents

Date Detected: 11/2025
Type:Breach
Motivation: financial gain, data sale
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 5/2025
Type:Breach
Motivation: financial gain
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kiewit.jpeg
Kiewit
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Kiewit company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Cooper Steel company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Cooper Steel company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Kiewit company has not reported any.

In the current year, Kiewit company and Cooper Steel company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Kiewit company nor Cooper Steel company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Cooper Steel company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Kiewit company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Kiewit company nor Cooper Steel company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Cooper Steel company nor Kiewit company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Cooper Steel nor Kiewit holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Kiewit company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Cooper Steel company.

Kiewit company employs more people globally than Cooper Steel company, reflecting its scale as a Construction.

Neither Cooper Steel nor Kiewit holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Cooper Steel nor Kiewit holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Cooper Steel nor Kiewit holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Cooper Steel nor Kiewit holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Cooper Steel nor Kiewit holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Cooper Steel nor Kiewit holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.