Comparison Overview

Cooper Grace Ward

VS

Stijns Coach

Cooper Grace Ward

Level 21, 400 George Street, Brisbane, Queensland, 4000, AU
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Cooper Grace Ward Lawyers is one of Queensland’s largest independent law firms, servicing clients with a local, national and international presence. With more than 200 team members, we provide a comprehensive range of commercially focused legal services in areas including commercial, litigation and dispute resolution, insurance, property and family law. We have an exceptional team culture that helps us develop strong client relationships, better understand our clients’ businesses, and deliver outcomes that align with our clients’ needs. Cooper Grace Ward Lawyers has an excellent reputation in the legal and business communities. We are committed to the success of our clients and our team members, which has resulted in many nationally and internationally recognised awards for legal expertise, client service and workplace practices such as wellbeing and diversity and inclusion.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 193
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Stijns Coach

None, None, Ottignies, None, BE, None
Last Update: 2025-11-28

Juriste, criminologue et formatrice agréée par le SPFI, je mets mes connaissances de la législation gardiennage à votre disposition: dossiers d'autorisation, respect des obligations légales au quotidien, sur le terrain mais aussi au niveau administratif, veille législative (vous serez averti immédiatement de l'entrée en vigueur de nouvelles règles ou encore de modifications de règles existantes... Contactez-nous pour identifier la formule qui répondra à vos besoins!

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: None
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cooper-grace-ward.jpeg
Cooper Grace Ward
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/stijnscoach.jpeg
Stijns Coach
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Cooper Grace Ward
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Stijns Coach
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cooper Grace Ward in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Stijns Coach in 2025.

Incident History — Cooper Grace Ward (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cooper Grace Ward cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Stijns Coach (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Stijns Coach cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cooper-grace-ward.jpeg
Cooper Grace Ward
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/stijnscoach.jpeg
Stijns Coach
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Stijns Coach company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Cooper Grace Ward company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Stijns Coach company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Cooper Grace Ward company.

In the current year, Stijns Coach company and Cooper Grace Ward company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Stijns Coach company nor Cooper Grace Ward company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Stijns Coach company nor Cooper Grace Ward company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Stijns Coach company nor Cooper Grace Ward company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Cooper Grace Ward company nor Stijns Coach company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Cooper Grace Ward nor Stijns Coach holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Cooper Grace Ward company nor Stijns Coach company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Neither Cooper Grace Ward nor Stijns Coach holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Cooper Grace Ward nor Stijns Coach holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Cooper Grace Ward nor Stijns Coach holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Cooper Grace Ward nor Stijns Coach holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Cooper Grace Ward nor Stijns Coach holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Cooper Grace Ward nor Stijns Coach holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X