Comparison Overview

Coobeh

VS

Grupo Bigfer

Coobeh

13/8 Rawlinson St, O'connor, Western Australia, 6163, AU
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Coobeh is a family-owned and operated business located in Perth, Western Australia, specializing in custom TV cabinets and entertainment units. We take pride in designing, fabricating, and installing unique, one-of-a-kind entertainment units tailored to your specific house style. Our meticulous approach considers every aspect of the process, ensuring that your vision seamlessly comes to life. Whether you seek a stylish TV cabinet or an elaborate entertainment center, we are dedicated to delivering quality, custom solutions that meet your needs and reflect your personal style.

NAICS: 337
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Grupo Bigfer

Rua Papa João XXIII, Farroupilha, RS, 95180000, BR
Last Update: 2025-11-26

O Grupo Bigfer está localizado na cidade de Farroupilha, Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil. Há mais de 20 anos no mercado de acessórios para móveis, oferece não só produtos, mas também soluções. Para tanto, desenvolve constantemente novos produtos e avança em tecnologia de produção, para suprir um mercado cada vez mais exigente. Possui uma linha completa com mais de 6.000 itens fabricados e 8.000 itens revendidos, confecciona kits de acessórios para montagem do móvel, o que facilita o controle de estoque, a redução de processos e a garantia de qualidade para o moveleiro. Atua também no mercado de embalagens plásticas flexíveis, fornecendo para mais de 10.000 clientes em todo o Brasil. Com a aquisição da unidade Hettich do Brasil, em 2010, além de potencializar a liderança no mercado de acessórios para móveis o Grupo Bigfer torna-se também o maior transformador brasileiro de Zamak, com importante atuação na linha branca.

NAICS: 337
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 755
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/coobeh.jpeg
Coobeh
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/grupo-bigfer---filial-farroupilha-rs.jpeg
Grupo Bigfer
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Coobeh
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Grupo Bigfer
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Coobeh in 2025.

Incidents vs Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Grupo Bigfer in 2025.

Incident History — Coobeh (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Coobeh cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Grupo Bigfer (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Grupo Bigfer cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/coobeh.jpeg
Coobeh
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/grupo-bigfer---filial-farroupilha-rs.jpeg
Grupo Bigfer
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Grupo Bigfer company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Coobeh company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Grupo Bigfer company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Coobeh company.

In the current year, Grupo Bigfer company and Coobeh company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Grupo Bigfer company nor Coobeh company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Grupo Bigfer company nor Coobeh company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Grupo Bigfer company nor Coobeh company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Coobeh company nor Grupo Bigfer company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Coobeh nor Grupo Bigfer holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Coobeh company nor Grupo Bigfer company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Grupo Bigfer company employs more people globally than Coobeh company, reflecting its scale as a Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing.

Neither Coobeh nor Grupo Bigfer holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Coobeh nor Grupo Bigfer holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Coobeh nor Grupo Bigfer holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Coobeh nor Grupo Bigfer holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Coobeh nor Grupo Bigfer holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Coobeh nor Grupo Bigfer holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.