Comparison Overview

Controx, Inc.

VS

Ward Mechanical Equipment, Inc.

Controx, Inc.

5776 Urbana Road, Springfield, 45502, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

For more than 115 years, Controx-Neuhäuser has specialized in the manufacture of cutting tools for metals and composite materials. We are focused on our customers, for whom we are a strong partner to help optimizing their production processes. Besides our comprehensive service and consulting, our main areas of expertise are our standard and special tools, which are optimized for the customer's specific demands and applications. In our production site in Prüm, Germany, modern and extremely flexible machine tools are used for the manufacture of cutting tools in small, medium and large volumes. From our Springfield/OH location we serve our customers in the US and Canada.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Ward Mechanical Equipment, Inc.

210 Marketridge, Ridgeland, MS, 392157, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Ward Mechanical is a company that values the highest level of service for our customers and the lines that we represent. Started in Mississippi in 1965, the same core values that the company was founded upon then, still exist today. With a unique combination of the finest manufacturers and a knowledgeable and motivated staff, Ward Mechanical Equipment stands out for our service and integrity. Extensive inventories and quick deliveries ensure customer satisfaction. Our mission is to be the preferred supplier of HVAC products to our customers in the State of Mississipi by providing quality products, engineering and design expertise and superior customer service.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 24
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/controx-inc.jpeg
Controx, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ward-mechanical.jpeg
Ward Mechanical Equipment, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Controx, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Ward Mechanical Equipment, Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Controx, Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ward Mechanical Equipment, Inc. in 2025.

Incident History — Controx, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Controx, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Ward Mechanical Equipment, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ward Mechanical Equipment, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/controx-inc.jpeg
Controx, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ward-mechanical.jpeg
Ward Mechanical Equipment, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Ward Mechanical Equipment, Inc. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Controx, Inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Ward Mechanical Equipment, Inc. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Controx, Inc. company.

In the current year, Ward Mechanical Equipment, Inc. company and Controx, Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Ward Mechanical Equipment, Inc. company nor Controx, Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Ward Mechanical Equipment, Inc. company nor Controx, Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Ward Mechanical Equipment, Inc. company nor Controx, Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Controx, Inc. company nor Ward Mechanical Equipment, Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Controx, Inc. nor Ward Mechanical Equipment, Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Controx, Inc. company nor Ward Mechanical Equipment, Inc. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Ward Mechanical Equipment, Inc. company employs more people globally than Controx, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering.

Neither Controx, Inc. nor Ward Mechanical Equipment, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Controx, Inc. nor Ward Mechanical Equipment, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Controx, Inc. nor Ward Mechanical Equipment, Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Controx, Inc. nor Ward Mechanical Equipment, Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Controx, Inc. nor Ward Mechanical Equipment, Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Controx, Inc. nor Ward Mechanical Equipment, Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H