Comparison Overview

Contour Motion, Inc.

VS

William Goodyear co.

Contour Motion, Inc.

780 Montague Expy, Suite 203, San Jose, California, US, 95131
Last Update: 2025-11-26
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.ContourMotion.com

Contour Motion is a Manufacturer's Representative focused on the application of Motion Control solutions in Northern California and Northern Nevada. With over 40 years of combined experience and representing some of the premier suppliers in the industry, Contour Motion is perfectly positioned to solve even the most demanding Motion Control and Automation challenges. Products range from Mechanical Components (Ballscrews, Linear Bearings, Couplings, etc.) to Electrical Motion Control products (Integrated Servo Motors, Linear Servo Motors, Steppers, Amplifiers, Multi-Axis Controllers, etc.);but the biggest value to the Customer is the knowledge and support in integrating such Electro-Mechanical Solutions.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 12
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

William Goodyear co.

2802 Gray Fox Rd, Monroe, NC, 28110, US
Last Update: 2025-11-25
Between 750 and 799
http://www.wmgoodyear.com

We manufacture a variety of rubber products for industrial applications. Our molded products department produces items ranging from poultry picking fingers to truck axle stops. Our roll department can produce rolls up to 12" diameter and 10' long, covered with any vulcanized polymer and finished with any surface profile. Our belting department produces vulcanized belts using our trademarked Posi-Feed compound or any other vulcanized polymer. Belts can be perforated or finished to any customer specification.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/contour-motion-inc-.jpeg
Contour Motion, Inc.
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/william-goodyear-co..jpeg
William Goodyear co.
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Contour Motion, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
William Goodyear co.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Industrial Automation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Contour Motion, Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Industrial Automation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for William Goodyear co. in 2025.

Incident History — Contour Motion, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Contour Motion, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — William Goodyear co. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

William Goodyear co. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/contour-motion-inc-.jpeg
Contour Motion, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/william-goodyear-co..jpeg
William Goodyear co.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

William Goodyear co. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Contour Motion, Inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, William Goodyear co. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Contour Motion, Inc. company.

In the current year, William Goodyear co. company and Contour Motion, Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither William Goodyear co. company nor Contour Motion, Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither William Goodyear co. company nor Contour Motion, Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither William Goodyear co. company nor Contour Motion, Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Contour Motion, Inc. company nor William Goodyear co. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Contour Motion, Inc. nor William Goodyear co. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Contour Motion, Inc. company nor William Goodyear co. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Contour Motion, Inc. company employs more people globally than William Goodyear co. company, reflecting its scale as a Industrial Automation.

Neither Contour Motion, Inc. nor William Goodyear co. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Contour Motion, Inc. nor William Goodyear co. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Contour Motion, Inc. nor William Goodyear co. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Contour Motion, Inc. nor William Goodyear co. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Contour Motion, Inc. nor William Goodyear co. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Contour Motion, Inc. nor William Goodyear co. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References