Comparison Overview

CDMG Engineering

VS

Rus-Tec Engineering Ltd.

CDMG Engineering

150 Technology Drive, Canonsburg, PA, 15317, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

INDUSTRIAL STRENGTH TAILORED TO YOUR NEEDS. CDMG is one of the nation’s foremost engineering companies serving 6 principal industrial markets: metals, glass, oil & gas, chemical, power, and light manufacturing. Since 1991 we have embraced new challenges by following our goal of always delivering projects on time, within budget, and to the highest level of quality. Led by a staff of experienced multi-disciplined engineers and project management professionals operating out of Southpointe in Canonsburg, PA, CDMG completes projects across the U.S and abroad. Our buildings exceed expectations by meeting local codes as well as MBMA and IAS requirements. CDMG is an authorized NUCOR builder and a subsidiary of the STEVENS family of companies. CDMG: http://www.cdmg.com/ STEVENS: http://www.stevensec.com/

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 92
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Rus-Tec Engineering Ltd.

75 Saskatchewan Ave, Devon, Alberta, CA, T9G 1E5
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Practical approach; Professional quality. Rus-Tec Engineering applies a broad range of field experience and outside-the-box thinking to develop targeted solutions for our clients. We have built our company on strong relationships and achieve quality results. We believe that a hands-on approach, a willingness to challenge the industry norm, and a commitment to integrity and quality will ensure our customers appreciate both the process and the results of working with Rus-Tec Engineering.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 10
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/continental-design-and-management-group.jpeg
CDMG Engineering
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rus-tec-engineering-ltd..jpeg
Rus-Tec Engineering Ltd.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
CDMG Engineering
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Rus-Tec Engineering Ltd.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CDMG Engineering in 2025.

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Rus-Tec Engineering Ltd. in 2025.

Incident History — CDMG Engineering (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CDMG Engineering cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Rus-Tec Engineering Ltd. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Rus-Tec Engineering Ltd. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/continental-design-and-management-group.jpeg
CDMG Engineering
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rus-tec-engineering-ltd..jpeg
Rus-Tec Engineering Ltd.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

CDMG Engineering company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Rus-Tec Engineering Ltd. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Rus-Tec Engineering Ltd. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to CDMG Engineering company.

In the current year, Rus-Tec Engineering Ltd. company and CDMG Engineering company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Rus-Tec Engineering Ltd. company nor CDMG Engineering company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Rus-Tec Engineering Ltd. company nor CDMG Engineering company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Rus-Tec Engineering Ltd. company nor CDMG Engineering company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither CDMG Engineering company nor Rus-Tec Engineering Ltd. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither CDMG Engineering nor Rus-Tec Engineering Ltd. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither CDMG Engineering company nor Rus-Tec Engineering Ltd. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

CDMG Engineering company employs more people globally than Rus-Tec Engineering Ltd. company, reflecting its scale as a Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering.

Neither CDMG Engineering nor Rus-Tec Engineering Ltd. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither CDMG Engineering nor Rus-Tec Engineering Ltd. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither CDMG Engineering nor Rus-Tec Engineering Ltd. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither CDMG Engineering nor Rus-Tec Engineering Ltd. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither CDMG Engineering nor Rus-Tec Engineering Ltd. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither CDMG Engineering nor Rus-Tec Engineering Ltd. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H