Comparison Overview

Continental Datalabel

VS

UltraPress

Continental Datalabel

1855 Fox Lane, Elgin, 60123, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799

Continental Datalabel is one of the pioneers in the Pressure Sensitive Label and Tag Industry. Continental offers close to 10,000 different labels and tags covering numerous markets and applications. The company stocks nearly 1,000 of these items in its nationwide inventory of products. Continental's product line is one of the broadest in the industry...from low cost, high volume commodity shipping labels to specialized durable labels/tags for use in outdoor storage; Continental provides the label and tag to fit virtually every application. Continental has four distribution centers positioned strategically around the United States which offer rapid response times to Continental customers.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 74
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

UltraPress

340 E 2nd St, #408, Los Angeles, California, US, 90012
Last Update: 2025-12-12
Between 750 and 799

UltraPress specializes in delivering the highest quality custom screen printing and embroidered apparel in the industry. We manufacture all of our screen printed and embroidered apparel in house in Southern California, providing you with the lowest prices. We never charge for shipping or rush fees. We also hand digitize your art in house, never outsourcing to cheaper, low quality digitizing services. Choose the garment that works best for you from our extensive product catalog, including: T-Shirts, Polos, Tank Tops, Spirit Jerseys, Hats, Athletic Wear and Sweatshirts/Jackets. We specialize in the following production methods: Screen Printing and Direct-to-Garment Printing, Embroidery, Puff Embroidery.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/continental-datalabel.jpeg
Continental Datalabel
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ultrapressprinting.jpeg
UltraPress
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Continental Datalabel
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
UltraPress
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Continental Datalabel in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for UltraPress in 2025.

Incident History — Continental Datalabel (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Continental Datalabel cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — UltraPress (X = Date, Y = Severity)

UltraPress cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/continental-datalabel.jpeg
Continental Datalabel
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ultrapressprinting.jpeg
UltraPress
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

UltraPress company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Continental Datalabel company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, UltraPress company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Continental Datalabel company.

In the current year, UltraPress company and Continental Datalabel company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither UltraPress company nor Continental Datalabel company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither UltraPress company nor Continental Datalabel company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither UltraPress company nor Continental Datalabel company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Continental Datalabel company nor UltraPress company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Continental Datalabel nor UltraPress holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Continental Datalabel company nor UltraPress company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Continental Datalabel company employs more people globally than UltraPress company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Continental Datalabel nor UltraPress holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Continental Datalabel nor UltraPress holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Continental Datalabel nor UltraPress holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Continental Datalabel nor UltraPress holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Continental Datalabel nor UltraPress holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Continental Datalabel nor UltraPress holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N