Comparison Overview

Contentra Inc.

VS

Wine Spectator

Contentra Inc.

D-103 Okhla Industrial Area, New Delhi, undefined, 110020, IN
Last Update: 2025-11-28
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.contentra.us

Contentra Inc. delivers full life-cycle content management services to leading publishers, content aggregators, Fortune 500 companies and government organizations such as national libraries — all from its ISO-certified facilities. Contentra has offices across the United States, Europe, and India. Trusted for more than 14 years and by more than 100 delighted clients. If you are thinking content, think Contentra!

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 329
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Wine Spectator

825 Eighth Avenue, New York, NY, 10019, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799
http://www.winespectator.com

Founded in 1976, Wine Spectator is the world’s most influential source of wine information, both in print and on the Internet. Wine Spectator editors review more than 11,000 wines each year in blind tastings, and each issue contains from 400 to more than 600 wine reviews with detailed tasting notes and analysis. The magazine sets stringent standards for itself and relies on the proven abilities and experiences of its editors as tasters and critics. WineSpectator.com, launched in October 1996, features more than 400,000 wine ratings, tasting reports, news and features, editors'​ blogs, videos and other original content you won't find anywhere else. In 1981, Wine Spectator launched its Restaurant Awards program, which recognizes restaurants whose wine lists offer interesting selections, are appropriate to their cuisine and appeal to a wide range of wine lovers. The program reviews restaurant wine lists on three levels: the Award of Excellence, with 2,453 current winners; the Best of Award of Excellence, with 1,215 current winners; and the Grand Award, with 91 current winners. Winners are located in all 50 states and over 75 countries. For more information, please visit www.winespectator.com or follow @WineSpectator on Twitter and Instagram.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 102
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/contentra-technologies.jpeg
Contentra Inc.
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/wine-spectator.jpeg
Wine Spectator
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Contentra Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Wine Spectator
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Contentra Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Wine Spectator in 2025.

Incident History — Contentra Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Contentra Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Wine Spectator (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Wine Spectator cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/contentra-technologies.jpeg
Contentra Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/wine-spectator.jpeg
Wine Spectator
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Contentra Inc. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Wine Spectator company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Wine Spectator company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Contentra Inc. company.

In the current year, Wine Spectator company and Contentra Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Wine Spectator company nor Contentra Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Wine Spectator company nor Contentra Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Wine Spectator company nor Contentra Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Contentra Inc. company nor Wine Spectator company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Contentra Inc. nor Wine Spectator holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Contentra Inc. company nor Wine Spectator company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Contentra Inc. company employs more people globally than Wine Spectator company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither Contentra Inc. nor Wine Spectator holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Contentra Inc. nor Wine Spectator holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Contentra Inc. nor Wine Spectator holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Contentra Inc. nor Wine Spectator holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Contentra Inc. nor Wine Spectator holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Contentra Inc. nor Wine Spectator holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References
Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References