Comparison Overview

Content Sparks

VS

Advanced Practice Strategies (APS)

Content Sparks

undefined, Boulder, Colorado, 80304, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

At Content Sparks we create and sell White Label, PLR Courses on the hottest business topics. Consultants, coaches, educators and trainers use our content to quickly create their own online courses, coaching programs, and live workshops - all without creating anything from scratch. Use our brandable content to save time in creating marketing content, products to sell, content to help customers succeed, and to build your own skills and knowledge. You can edit everything, adapt the content to your market, and add your own name and voice. Then record videos, upload content to your LMS, deliver webinars and livestreams, or even present it in live workshops. We have over 30 years of experience designing and developing business learning content for large corporations, so you can be confident that every piece of content you use is the highest, professional quality. We use our expertise to help you show the world the expert that YOU are.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Advanced Practice Strategies (APS)

470 Atlantic Avenue, Boston, MA, 02210, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

Advanced Practice Strategies (APS) is a technology company that works with organizations to build the best patient care teams through our two assessment-based solutions Prophecy and GNOSIS. Our data-driven insights help the nation’s leading health systems reduce risk, costs and nurse vacancy so they can deliver safer, more consistent patient care. APS serves over a hundred major health systems in the United States. We are a proven and trusted partner that works with our clients in an engaging and data-driven way that delivers meaningful impact for both providers and their patients.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/content-sparks.jpeg
Content Sparks
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/advanced-practice-strategies-aps.jpeg
Advanced Practice Strategies (APS)
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Content Sparks
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Advanced Practice Strategies (APS)
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs E-learning Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Content Sparks in 2025.

Incidents vs E-learning Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Advanced Practice Strategies (APS) in 2025.

Incident History — Content Sparks (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Content Sparks cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Advanced Practice Strategies (APS) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Advanced Practice Strategies (APS) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/content-sparks.jpeg
Content Sparks
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/advanced-practice-strategies-aps.jpeg
Advanced Practice Strategies (APS)
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Content Sparks company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Advanced Practice Strategies (APS) company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Advanced Practice Strategies (APS) company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Content Sparks company.

In the current year, Advanced Practice Strategies (APS) company and Content Sparks company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Advanced Practice Strategies (APS) company nor Content Sparks company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Advanced Practice Strategies (APS) company nor Content Sparks company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Advanced Practice Strategies (APS) company nor Content Sparks company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Content Sparks company nor Advanced Practice Strategies (APS) company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Content Sparks nor Advanced Practice Strategies (APS) holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Content Sparks company nor Advanced Practice Strategies (APS) company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Advanced Practice Strategies (APS) company employs more people globally than Content Sparks company, reflecting its scale as a E-learning.

Neither Content Sparks nor Advanced Practice Strategies (APS) holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Content Sparks nor Advanced Practice Strategies (APS) holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Content Sparks nor Advanced Practice Strategies (APS) holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Content Sparks nor Advanced Practice Strategies (APS) holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Content Sparks nor Advanced Practice Strategies (APS) holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Content Sparks nor Advanced Practice Strategies (APS) holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

HedgeDoc is an open source, real-time, collaborative, markdown notes application. Prior to 1.10.4, some of HedgeDoc's OAuth2 endpoints for social login providers such as Google, GitHub, GitLab, Facebook or Dropbox lack CSRF protection, since they don't send a state parameter and verify the response using this parameter. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.10.4.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

Langflow versions up to and including 1.6.9 contain a chained vulnerability that enables account takeover and remote code execution. An overly permissive CORS configuration (allow_origins='*' with allow_credentials=True) combined with a refresh token cookie configured as SameSite=None allows a malicious webpage to perform cross-origin requests that include credentials and successfully call the refresh endpoint. An attacker-controlled origin can therefore obtain fresh access_token / refresh_token pairs for a victim session. Obtained tokens permit access to authenticated endpoints — including built-in code-execution functionality — allowing the attacker to execute arbitrary code and achieve full system compromise.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A vulnerability was detected in xerrors Yuxi-Know up to 0.4.0. This vulnerability affects the function OtherEmbedding.aencode of the file /src/models/embed.py. Performing manipulation of the argument health_url results in server-side request forgery. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit is now public and may be used. The patch is named 0ff771dc1933d5a6b78f804115e78a7d8625c3f3. To fix this issue, it is recommended to deploy a patch. The vendor responded with a vulnerability confirmation and a list of security measures they have established already (e.g. disabled URL parsing, disabled URL upload mode, removed URL-to-markdown conversion).

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.8
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:M/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 4.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A security vulnerability has been detected in Rarlab RAR App up to 7.11 Build 127 on Android. This affects an unknown part of the component com.rarlab.rar. Such manipulation leads to path traversal. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. Attacks of this nature are highly complex. It is indicated that the exploitability is difficult. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. Upgrading to version 7.20 build 128 is able to mitigate this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor responded very professional: "This is the real vulnerability affecting RAR for Android only. WinRAR and Unix RAR versions are not affected. We already fixed it in RAR for Android 7.20 build 128 and we publicly mentioned it in that version changelog. (...) To avoid confusion among users, it would be useful if such disclosure emphasizes that it is RAR for Android only issue and WinRAR isn't affected."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.1
Severity: HIGH
AV:N/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 5.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 2.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A weakness has been identified in ZSPACE Q2C NAS up to 1.1.0210050. Affected by this issue is the function zfilev2_api.OpenSafe of the file /v2/file/safe/open of the component HTTP POST Request Handler. This manipulation of the argument safe_dir causes command injection. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be exploited. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 9.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:C/I:C/A:C
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 7.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X