Comparison Overview

Contemporary Arts Center, New Orleans

VS

Onassis Foundation USA

Contemporary Arts Center, New Orleans

900 Camp Street, New Orleans, LA, 70130, US
Last Update: 2026-01-23
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.cacno.org

The Contemporary Arts Center (CAC) is committed to artists, the presentation of multidisciplinary work, and the value and power of the art of our time. Formed in 1976 by a passionate group of visual and performing artists when the movement to tear down the walls between visual and performing arts was active nationwide, the CAC expresses its mission by organizing world class curated exhibitions, performances, and public programs that educate and enlarge audiences for the arts while encouraging collaboration among diverse stakeholders composed of artists, institutions, communities, and supporters throughout the world.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 29
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Onassis Foundation USA

645 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY, 10022, US
Last Update: 2026-01-23
Between 750 and 799
http://www.onassisusa.org

The Onassis Foundation USA, a non-profit organization established in 1999 and an affiliate of the parent Foundation in Greece, is committed to the promotion of Greek culture. By cooperating with educational and cultural institutions in Greece and throughout the Americas, the Onassis Foundation USA promotes cultural relations. The mission of the Onassis Foundation USA is realized through two major initiatives, one cultural and educational for the general public through its Onassis Cultural Center New York, and one academic, the University Seminars Program, that places eminent scholars from all over the world in universities in North and Latin America for courses on topics related to Hellenic civilization.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 11
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/contemporary-arts-center_2.jpeg
Contemporary Arts Center, New Orleans
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/onassis-foundation-usa-.jpeg
Onassis Foundation USA
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Contemporary Arts Center, New Orleans
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Onassis Foundation USA
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Contemporary Arts Center, New Orleans in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Onassis Foundation USA in 2026.

Incident History — Contemporary Arts Center, New Orleans (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Contemporary Arts Center, New Orleans cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Onassis Foundation USA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Onassis Foundation USA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/contemporary-arts-center_2.jpeg
Contemporary Arts Center, New Orleans
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/onassis-foundation-usa-.jpeg
Onassis Foundation USA
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Contemporary Arts Center, New Orleans company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Onassis Foundation USA company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Onassis Foundation USA company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Contemporary Arts Center, New Orleans company.

In the current year, Onassis Foundation USA company and Contemporary Arts Center, New Orleans company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Onassis Foundation USA company nor Contemporary Arts Center, New Orleans company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Onassis Foundation USA company nor Contemporary Arts Center, New Orleans company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Onassis Foundation USA company nor Contemporary Arts Center, New Orleans company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Contemporary Arts Center, New Orleans company nor Onassis Foundation USA company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Contemporary Arts Center, New Orleans nor Onassis Foundation USA holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Contemporary Arts Center, New Orleans company nor Onassis Foundation USA company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Contemporary Arts Center, New Orleans company employs more people globally than Onassis Foundation USA company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Contemporary Arts Center, New Orleans nor Onassis Foundation USA holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Contemporary Arts Center, New Orleans nor Onassis Foundation USA holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Contemporary Arts Center, New Orleans nor Onassis Foundation USA holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Contemporary Arts Center, New Orleans nor Onassis Foundation USA holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Contemporary Arts Center, New Orleans nor Onassis Foundation USA holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Contemporary Arts Center, New Orleans nor Onassis Foundation USA holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References