Comparison Overview

Contemporary Art Museum St. Louis

VS

Log Cabin Village

Contemporary Art Museum St. Louis

3750 Washington Blvd, St. Louis, MO, US, 63108
Last Update: 2025-12-01
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://camstl.org

The Contemporary Art Museum St. Louis works to enrich lives and inspire curiosity, creativity, and learning through experiences with contemporary art. Focused on a dynamic array of changing exhibitions, the Museum reflects and contributes to the global cultural landscape while engaging thousands of visitors through a wide array of public programs. CAM nurtures the creative minds of our city’s youth through free, in-depth art education, making a long-lasting impact on the community. We are a site for discovery, a welcoming space, free and open to all.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 55
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Log Cabin Village

2100 Log Cabin Village Ln, Fort Worth, 76109, US
Last Update: 2025-12-02
Between 750 and 799
http://www.logcabinvillage.org

The purpose of Log Cabin Village is to educate the public through the collection, preservation and interpretation of artifacts, representative structures, and other items of social and cultural significance to Texas’ pioneer era (1840-1890). Log Cabin Village aspires to build connections to 19th century Texas by providing educational opportunities and sensory experiences that are engaging, accurate, and as authentic as possible. We invite you to escape the present and experience the past… right here in the heart of Fort Worth. We can’t wait to see you here!

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/contemporary-art-museum-st.-louis.jpeg
Contemporary Art Museum St. Louis
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/log-cabin-village.jpeg
Log Cabin Village
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Contemporary Art Museum St. Louis
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Log Cabin Village
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Contemporary Art Museum St. Louis in 2025.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Log Cabin Village in 2025.

Incident History — Contemporary Art Museum St. Louis (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Contemporary Art Museum St. Louis cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Log Cabin Village (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Log Cabin Village cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/contemporary-art-museum-st.-louis.jpeg
Contemporary Art Museum St. Louis
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/log-cabin-village.jpeg
Log Cabin Village
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Log Cabin Village company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Contemporary Art Museum St. Louis company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Log Cabin Village company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Contemporary Art Museum St. Louis company.

In the current year, Log Cabin Village company and Contemporary Art Museum St. Louis company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Log Cabin Village company nor Contemporary Art Museum St. Louis company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Log Cabin Village company nor Contemporary Art Museum St. Louis company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Log Cabin Village company nor Contemporary Art Museum St. Louis company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Contemporary Art Museum St. Louis company nor Log Cabin Village company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Contemporary Art Museum St. Louis nor Log Cabin Village holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Contemporary Art Museum St. Louis company nor Log Cabin Village company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Contemporary Art Museum St. Louis company employs more people globally than Log Cabin Village company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Contemporary Art Museum St. Louis nor Log Cabin Village holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Contemporary Art Museum St. Louis nor Log Cabin Village holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Contemporary Art Museum St. Louis nor Log Cabin Village holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Contemporary Art Museum St. Louis nor Log Cabin Village holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Contemporary Art Museum St. Louis nor Log Cabin Village holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Contemporary Art Museum St. Louis nor Log Cabin Village holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ImageMagick is free and open-source software used for editing and manipulating digital images. Prior to 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34, there is a vulnerability in ImageMagick’s Magick++ layer that manifests when Options::fontFamily is invoked with an empty string. Clearing a font family calls RelinquishMagickMemory on _drawInfo->font, freeing the font string but leaving _drawInfo->font pointing to freed memory while _drawInfo->family is set to that (now-invalid) pointer. Any later cleanup or reuse of _drawInfo->font re-frees or dereferences dangling memory. DestroyDrawInfo and other setters (Options::font, Image::font) assume _drawInfo->font remains valid, so destruction or subsequent updates trigger crashes or heap corruption. This vulnerability is fixed in 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
References
Description

FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 has a Remote Code Execution via Unrestricted File Upload in Ad Management. FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 allows authenticated remote attackers to upload files that the server later executes (or stores in an executable location) without sufficient validation, sanitization, or execution restrictions. An authenticated remote attacker can upload a crafted PHP file and cause the application or web server to execute it, resulting in remote code execution (RCE).

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

PHPGurukul Billing System 1.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in the admin/index.php endpoint. Specifically, the username parameter accepts unvalidated user input, which is then concatenated directly into a backend SQL query.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

NMIS/BioDose software V22.02 and previous versions contain executable binaries with plain text hard-coded passwords. These hard-coded passwords could allow unauthorized access to both the application and database.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
cvss4
Base: 8.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

NMIS/BioDose V22.02 and previous versions' installation directory paths by default have insecure file permissions, which in certain deployment scenarios can enable users on client workstations to modify the program executables and libraries.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References