Comparison Overview

ConsultNet, Inc.

VS

Exinda Networks

ConsultNet, Inc.

3755 E Main St, St Charles, Illinois, 60174, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.consultnetinc.com

ConsultNet is a computer consulting company committed to providing excellent service and solutions to businesses. The service and dedication we offer our clients is unmatched, and we strive to earn and keep their trust. With over 17 years of experience in the Chicago-land area, ConsultNet has the knowledge, experience and communication skills to meet your short and long term goals.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 8
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Exinda Networks

3rd Floor, Boston, MA, 02109, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799
http://www.gfi.com/products-and-solutions/network-security-solutions/exinda-network-orchestrator

Exinda’s application control solutions provide multi-dimensional visibility and control for end-to-end management of both the network and the cloud to help organizations guarantee the best possible quality of experience for business critical applications. Exinda controls unsanctioned applications and ensures that sanctioned applications, like Skype for Business, Office 365 and SharePoint, perform reliably and consistently. Exinda has helped more than 4,000 organizations in over 80 countries worldwide improve quality of experience for business-critical applications in both public and private cloud.

NAICS: 51125
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 17
Subsidiaries: 16
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/consultnet-inc..jpeg
ConsultNet, Inc.
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/exinda-networks.jpeg
Exinda Networks
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
ConsultNet, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Exinda Networks
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Computer Networking Products Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ConsultNet, Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Computer Networking Products Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Exinda Networks in 2025.

Incident History — ConsultNet, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ConsultNet, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Exinda Networks (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Exinda Networks cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/consultnet-inc..jpeg
ConsultNet, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/exinda-networks.jpeg
Exinda Networks
Incidents

Date Detected: 03/2023
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Compromised Credentials
Blog: Blog

FAQ

ConsultNet, Inc. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Exinda Networks company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Exinda Networks company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas ConsultNet, Inc. company has not reported any.

In the current year, Exinda Networks company and ConsultNet, Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Exinda Networks company nor ConsultNet, Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Exinda Networks company has disclosed at least one data breach, while ConsultNet, Inc. company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Exinda Networks company nor ConsultNet, Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither ConsultNet, Inc. company nor Exinda Networks company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither ConsultNet, Inc. nor Exinda Networks holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Exinda Networks company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to ConsultNet, Inc. company.

Exinda Networks company employs more people globally than ConsultNet, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Computer Networking Products.

Neither ConsultNet, Inc. nor Exinda Networks holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither ConsultNet, Inc. nor Exinda Networks holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither ConsultNet, Inc. nor Exinda Networks holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither ConsultNet, Inc. nor Exinda Networks holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither ConsultNet, Inc. nor Exinda Networks holds HIPAA certification.

Neither ConsultNet, Inc. nor Exinda Networks holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References
Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References