Comparison Overview

Consolidated Label Co.

VS

Perham Printing

Consolidated Label Co.

2001 East Lake Mary Blvd., Sanford, FL, 32773, US
Last Update: 2025-12-13
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.consolidatedlabel.com/

Consolidated Label Co., a division of Online Labels Group, is one of the country's leading suppliers of labels, shrink sleeves, and flexible packaging. We produce custom label products for thousands of customers across a variety of industries including food, beverage, household products, medical, pharmaceutical, and promotional products. Both digital printing presses and high-speed flexographic presses can be found in our plant which operates 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 119
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Perham Printing

PO Box 5, Perham, 56573, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799
http://www.perhamprinting.com

We are here to meet your every need -- from business forms to wedding announcements, custom wall canvases to logo designs. We will help you bring your idea to life! Visit us in Main Street Place on West Main in Perham, MN -- across from the post office. Perham Printing has been in business for more than 30 strong years. Our services include: • Graphic Design • Our talented creative team use the latest design software to provide exceptional graphic design services for your print or web projects. • Mailing • Perham Printing offers mailing services using 1st Class , 3rd Class Pre-Sort Standard, or EDDM imprints. You can use our permit number or your own. We will print, gather, fold, stuff or tab your mailing so you don't have to touch a thing! Let Perham Printing do all the work for you! • Offset Press • • High Speed Digital Printing • We provide high speed color or coping with both online and offline finishing.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/consolidated-label-co..jpeg
Consolidated Label Co.
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/perham-printing.jpeg
Perham Printing
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Consolidated Label Co.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Perham Printing
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Consolidated Label Co. in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Perham Printing in 2025.

Incident History — Consolidated Label Co. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Consolidated Label Co. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Perham Printing (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Perham Printing cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/consolidated-label-co..jpeg
Consolidated Label Co.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/perham-printing.jpeg
Perham Printing
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Perham Printing company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Consolidated Label Co. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Perham Printing company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Consolidated Label Co. company.

In the current year, Perham Printing company and Consolidated Label Co. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Perham Printing company nor Consolidated Label Co. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Perham Printing company nor Consolidated Label Co. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Perham Printing company nor Consolidated Label Co. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Consolidated Label Co. company nor Perham Printing company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Consolidated Label Co. nor Perham Printing holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Consolidated Label Co. company nor Perham Printing company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Consolidated Label Co. company employs more people globally than Perham Printing company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Consolidated Label Co. nor Perham Printing holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Consolidated Label Co. nor Perham Printing holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Consolidated Label Co. nor Perham Printing holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Consolidated Label Co. nor Perham Printing holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Consolidated Label Co. nor Perham Printing holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Consolidated Label Co. nor Perham Printing holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References