Comparison Overview

Conservative Partnership Institute

VS

Federal Science Partners

Conservative Partnership Institute

Washington, DC, US, 20003
Last Update: 2025-11-25

The Conservative Partnership Institute (CPI) is dedicated to providing a platform for citizen leaders, the conservative movement, Members of Congress, congressional staff and scholars to be connected. The organization works to provide these leaders with the tools, tactics, resources and strategies to help make them successful in advancing conservative policy solutions. Too often, conservatives send new leaders to Washington, D.C., but see disappointing results when they get to here. The truth is that many of these men and women want to do the right thing, but find it difficult to succeed as conservatives in Washington where they are surrounded by enormous institutional and media pressures to bend to the status quo of big government. CPI is led by former Congressman and Senator Jim DeMint and a team of experienced Capitol Hill veterans who have fought and beaten back the Washington establishment. The organization has access to the best policy research and scholars in the conservative movement, unmatched expertise in House and Senate procedure, and the relationships necessary to help conservatives on Capitol Hill succeed in restoring America to its founding principles. CPI does not take positions on legislation or engage in lobbying or partisan campaign activities. All programs are established for the purpose of promoting conservative policies and principles and are not based on considerations of any political party.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition: Executive, Legislative, and Other General Government Support
Employees: 38
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Federal Science Partners

1201 New York Avenue NW, Washington, District of Columbia, 20005, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27

Federal Science Partners, LLC is a government affairs firm providing professional services to institutions of higher education, national research facilities, scientific and education organizations, and leading technology companies. The firm is comprised of respected appropriations aides and federal agency experts. FSP provides targeted, strategic advice and insight into the federal budget and related policy development activities of relevant federal agencies and Congress as it relates to research, development and technology. Federal Science Partners • Enables its clients to effectively participate in the development of federal research and education priorities; • Positions the clients to effectively advocate for its research and education priorities; • Raises the client’s visibility with federal decision makers in productive ways, and • Develops and maintains vital integrity-backed working relationships with key decision makers in relevant federal agencies, the Congress and its committees, and with like-minded institutions and other advocacy organizations. The result of such services is a strengthened ability on the part of the client to successfully attract and retain federal support for its research and education priorities.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition: Executive, Legislative, and Other General Government Support
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/conservativepartnership.jpeg
Conservative Partnership Institute
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/federal-science-partners.jpeg
Federal Science Partners
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Conservative Partnership Institute
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Federal Science Partners
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Conservative Partnership Institute in 2025.

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Federal Science Partners in 2025.

Incident History — Conservative Partnership Institute (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Conservative Partnership Institute cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Federal Science Partners (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Federal Science Partners cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/conservativepartnership.jpeg
Conservative Partnership Institute
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/federal-science-partners.jpeg
Federal Science Partners
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Federal Science Partners company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Conservative Partnership Institute company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Federal Science Partners company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Conservative Partnership Institute company.

In the current year, Federal Science Partners company and Conservative Partnership Institute company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Federal Science Partners company nor Conservative Partnership Institute company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Federal Science Partners company nor Conservative Partnership Institute company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Federal Science Partners company nor Conservative Partnership Institute company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Conservative Partnership Institute company nor Federal Science Partners company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Conservative Partnership Institute nor Federal Science Partners holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Conservative Partnership Institute company nor Federal Science Partners company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Conservative Partnership Institute company employs more people globally than Federal Science Partners company, reflecting its scale as a Public Policy Offices.

Neither Conservative Partnership Institute nor Federal Science Partners holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Conservative Partnership Institute nor Federal Science Partners holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Conservative Partnership Institute nor Federal Science Partners holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Conservative Partnership Institute nor Federal Science Partners holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Conservative Partnership Institute nor Federal Science Partners holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Conservative Partnership Institute nor Federal Science Partners holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H