Comparison Overview

Conservation Technix, Inc

VS

Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission

Conservation Technix, Inc

PO Box 12736, Portland, OR, 97212, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27

Founded in 2006, Conservation Technix assists local government and non-profit organizations in efforts to finance and conserve greenspaces through innovative solutions and dynamic strategy development. Conservation Technix was established on the principle that the active use and conservation of open spaces promotes the environmental, social and economic vitality of communities. Conservation Technix specializes in developing comprehensive park system master plans that address park and recreation facilities, open space and trails, programs and services, maintenance, and future staffing and funding strategies. Through significant and relevant experience in public administration and management, Conservation Technix’ staff have “on the ground” knowledge of plan implementation, communication, marketing and finance strategy development, and a keen understanding of the requisite integration of capital facility planning, budgeting, and operations. Conservation Technix’ planning approach enables substantial public involvement and engenders guidance from policymakers to ensure implementable plans adapted to specific community goals. Conservation Technix, Inc provides the following professional services: * Comprehensive Park, Recreation, and Natural Resource Planning * Strategic Planning & Community Visioning * Public Involvement & Facilitation * Fiscal, Policy, and Trend Analyses * Conservation and Real Property Acquisition * Project Management * Grant Writing

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition: Executive, Legislative, and Other General Government Support
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission

GB
Last Update: 2025-11-27

The Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission is a new organisation established by the Child Maintenance and Other Payments Act 2008, following an in-depth review of child maintenance policy and delivery arrangements in this country. The Commission is responsible for the child maintenance system in Great Britain. The Commission’s key objective is to maximise the number of effective child maintenance arrangements that are in place, whether private or statutory. To achieve this aim, the Commission provides an information and support service (Child Maintenance Options) and oversees the statutory maintenance service currently run by the Child Support Agency. Over time, the Commission will improve arrangements for the assessment, collection and enforcement of child maintenance for parents using that service. The Commission is a crown Non-Departmental Public Body, which means it operates at arms length from Government, enabling it to innovate and provide services how and through the mechanisms it chooses. With this new structure, we have an opportunity to deliver a new system of child maintenance in Great Britain that really works for separated families.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition: Executive, Legislative, and Other General Government Support
Employees: 110
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/conservation-technix-inc.jpeg
Conservation Technix, Inc
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Conservation Technix, Inc
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Conservation Technix, Inc in 2025.

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission in 2025.

Incident History — Conservation Technix, Inc (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Conservation Technix, Inc cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/conservation-technix-inc.jpeg
Conservation Technix, Inc
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Conservation Technix, Inc company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Conservation Technix, Inc company.

In the current year, Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission company and Conservation Technix, Inc company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission company nor Conservation Technix, Inc company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission company nor Conservation Technix, Inc company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission company nor Conservation Technix, Inc company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Conservation Technix, Inc company nor Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Conservation Technix, Inc nor Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Conservation Technix, Inc company nor Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission company employs more people globally than Conservation Technix, Inc company, reflecting its scale as a Public Policy Offices.

Neither Conservation Technix, Inc nor Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Conservation Technix, Inc nor Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Conservation Technix, Inc nor Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Conservation Technix, Inc nor Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Conservation Technix, Inc nor Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Conservation Technix, Inc nor Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H