Comparison Overview

Conservation Center for Art & Historic Artifacts (CCAHA)

VS

The 1940 Air Terminal Museum

Conservation Center for Art & Historic Artifacts (CCAHA)

264 South 23rd Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19103, US
Last Update: 2025-12-02
Between 750 and 799

The Conservation Center for Art & Historic Artifacts (CCAHA) has grown to be one of the largest nonprofit conservation centers in the country. Its wide array of services, sophisticated treatment facilities, innovative approaches, and highly trained and experienced staff have earned it a prominent and respected place in the conservation field. Our mission is to provide expertise and leadership in the preservation of the world's cultural heritage. CCAHA specializes in the treatment of works of art and artifacts on paper, such as drawings, prints, maps, posters, historic wallpaper, photographs, rare books, scrapbooks, and manuscripts, along with related materials like parchment and papyrus. CCAHA also offers digital imaging services, on-site consultations, educational programs and seminars, internships, and emergency conservation services.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 43
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

The 1940 Air Terminal Museum

8325 Travelair, Houston, Texas, 77061, US
Last Update: 2025-12-03

The 1940 Air Terminal Museum is located in the old Houston Municipal Airport building located on the west side of William P. Hobby Airport. This building, opened in September of 1940, is a beautiful example of the art-deco architecture of the time, and served as Houston's only airport terminal until 1954. Today, it has been partially restored and houses many years of airline and civil aviation memorabilia. The 1940 Air Terminal Museum is a project of the Houston Aeronautical Heritage Society, a 501(c)(3) Texas Non-Profit Corporation.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 8
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/conservation-center-for-art-and-historic-artifacts.jpeg
Conservation Center for Art & Historic Artifacts (CCAHA)
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-1940-air-terminal-museum.jpeg
The 1940 Air Terminal Museum
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Conservation Center for Art & Historic Artifacts (CCAHA)
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
The 1940 Air Terminal Museum
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Conservation Center for Art & Historic Artifacts (CCAHA) in 2025.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The 1940 Air Terminal Museum in 2025.

Incident History — Conservation Center for Art & Historic Artifacts (CCAHA) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Conservation Center for Art & Historic Artifacts (CCAHA) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — The 1940 Air Terminal Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The 1940 Air Terminal Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/conservation-center-for-art-and-historic-artifacts.jpeg
Conservation Center for Art & Historic Artifacts (CCAHA)
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-1940-air-terminal-museum.jpeg
The 1940 Air Terminal Museum
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Conservation Center for Art & Historic Artifacts (CCAHA) company and The 1940 Air Terminal Museum company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, The 1940 Air Terminal Museum company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Conservation Center for Art & Historic Artifacts (CCAHA) company.

In the current year, The 1940 Air Terminal Museum company and Conservation Center for Art & Historic Artifacts (CCAHA) company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither The 1940 Air Terminal Museum company nor Conservation Center for Art & Historic Artifacts (CCAHA) company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither The 1940 Air Terminal Museum company nor Conservation Center for Art & Historic Artifacts (CCAHA) company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither The 1940 Air Terminal Museum company nor Conservation Center for Art & Historic Artifacts (CCAHA) company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Conservation Center for Art & Historic Artifacts (CCAHA) company nor The 1940 Air Terminal Museum company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Conservation Center for Art & Historic Artifacts (CCAHA) nor The 1940 Air Terminal Museum holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Conservation Center for Art & Historic Artifacts (CCAHA) company nor The 1940 Air Terminal Museum company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Conservation Center for Art & Historic Artifacts (CCAHA) company employs more people globally than The 1940 Air Terminal Museum company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Conservation Center for Art & Historic Artifacts (CCAHA) nor The 1940 Air Terminal Museum holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Conservation Center for Art & Historic Artifacts (CCAHA) nor The 1940 Air Terminal Museum holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Conservation Center for Art & Historic Artifacts (CCAHA) nor The 1940 Air Terminal Museum holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Conservation Center for Art & Historic Artifacts (CCAHA) nor The 1940 Air Terminal Museum holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Conservation Center for Art & Historic Artifacts (CCAHA) nor The 1940 Air Terminal Museum holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Conservation Center for Art & Historic Artifacts (CCAHA) nor The 1940 Air Terminal Museum holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X