Comparison Overview

Conservation Center for Art & Historic Artifacts (CCAHA)

VS

Santa Monica History Museum

Conservation Center for Art & Historic Artifacts (CCAHA)

264 South 23rd Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19103, US
Last Update: 2026-01-23
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.ccaha.org/

The Conservation Center for Art & Historic Artifacts (CCAHA) has grown to be one of the largest nonprofit conservation centers in the country. Its wide array of services, sophisticated treatment facilities, innovative approaches, and highly trained and experienced staff have earned it a prominent and respected place in the conservation field. Our mission is to provide expertise and leadership in the preservation of the world's cultural heritage. CCAHA specializes in the treatment of works of art and artifacts on paper, such as drawings, prints, maps, posters, historic wallpaper, photographs, rare books, scrapbooks, and manuscripts, along with related materials like parchment and papyrus. CCAHA also offers digital imaging services, on-site consultations, educational programs and seminars, internships, and emergency conservation services.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 43
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Santa Monica History Museum

1350 7th St, Santa Monica, California, undefined, US
Last Update: 2026-01-24
Between 750 and 799
http://santamonicahistory.org/

The Santa Monica History Museum, a non-profit organization, was founded in 1975 by the Santa Monica Centennial Committee to collect and preserve the history, art and culture of the Santa Monica Bay Area and to be the guardian/caretaker of the history. Its mission is the advancement of historical information and education, and the collection, documentation and preservation of objects and memorabilia relating to the Santa Monica Bay Area; and to give residents, particularly children, a sense of roots, belonging, and a strong appreciation for the unique history and qualities of their own city, and pride in the diverse, multi-cultural past of Santa Monica. The museum’s goal is to provide public access to its extensive collection through interpretive exhibitions, on- and off-site programs, and through archival and research services for youth and adults.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/conservation-center-for-art-and-historic-artifacts.jpeg
Conservation Center for Art & Historic Artifacts (CCAHA)
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/santa-monica-history-museum.jpeg
Santa Monica History Museum
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Conservation Center for Art & Historic Artifacts (CCAHA)
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Santa Monica History Museum
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Conservation Center for Art & Historic Artifacts (CCAHA) in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Santa Monica History Museum in 2026.

Incident History — Conservation Center for Art & Historic Artifacts (CCAHA) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Conservation Center for Art & Historic Artifacts (CCAHA) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Santa Monica History Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Santa Monica History Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/conservation-center-for-art-and-historic-artifacts.jpeg
Conservation Center for Art & Historic Artifacts (CCAHA)
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/santa-monica-history-museum.jpeg
Santa Monica History Museum
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Santa Monica History Museum company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Conservation Center for Art & Historic Artifacts (CCAHA) company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Santa Monica History Museum company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Conservation Center for Art & Historic Artifacts (CCAHA) company.

In the current year, Santa Monica History Museum company and Conservation Center for Art & Historic Artifacts (CCAHA) company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Santa Monica History Museum company nor Conservation Center for Art & Historic Artifacts (CCAHA) company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Santa Monica History Museum company nor Conservation Center for Art & Historic Artifacts (CCAHA) company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Santa Monica History Museum company nor Conservation Center for Art & Historic Artifacts (CCAHA) company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Conservation Center for Art & Historic Artifacts (CCAHA) company nor Santa Monica History Museum company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Conservation Center for Art & Historic Artifacts (CCAHA) nor Santa Monica History Museum holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Conservation Center for Art & Historic Artifacts (CCAHA) company nor Santa Monica History Museum company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Conservation Center for Art & Historic Artifacts (CCAHA) company employs more people globally than Santa Monica History Museum company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Conservation Center for Art & Historic Artifacts (CCAHA) nor Santa Monica History Museum holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Conservation Center for Art & Historic Artifacts (CCAHA) nor Santa Monica History Museum holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Conservation Center for Art & Historic Artifacts (CCAHA) nor Santa Monica History Museum holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Conservation Center for Art & Historic Artifacts (CCAHA) nor Santa Monica History Museum holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Conservation Center for Art & Historic Artifacts (CCAHA) nor Santa Monica History Museum holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Conservation Center for Art & Historic Artifacts (CCAHA) nor Santa Monica History Museum holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References
Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References
Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References