Comparison Overview

Conservant Systems

VS

Swan Associates, Inc.

Conservant Systems

Orange, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28

Winner of the 2016 Department of Energy FEMP JUMP Nationwide Energy Efficiency Competition, as well as the 2014 Department of Defense ESTCP Global Energy Efficiency Competition, Conservant System’s High Efficiency Dehumidification System (HEDS) is currently reducing dehumidification related chiller plant and boiler plant energy consumption by 40% to over 60% while reducing or eliminating biological growth and the associated health, wellness, productivity and hazmat remediation expenses. For retrofits or new construction no other technology compares in efficiency, simplicity, reliability and sustainability.

NAICS: 3334
NAICS Definition: Ventilation, Heating, Air-Conditioning, and Commercial Refrigeration Equipment Manufacturing
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Swan Associates, Inc.

49 Holly Drive, Newington, CT, 06111, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 700 and 749

Swan Associates offers solutions for all your commercial HVAC needs. We pride ourselves on building relationships with our customers that begin at the planning stage, don't end at completion, but continue into the future. We offer the best in: > Delivering the best solutions in the HVAC industry > Leading edge equipment and technology > Service and maintenance contracts > Full service parts department from all major brands

NAICS: 333
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 27
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/conservant-systems.jpeg
Conservant Systems
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/swan-associates-inc-.jpeg
Swan Associates, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Conservant Systems
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Swan Associates, Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs HVAC and Refrigeration Equipment Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Conservant Systems in 2025.

Incidents vs HVAC and Refrigeration Equipment Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Swan Associates, Inc. in 2025.

Incident History — Conservant Systems (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Conservant Systems cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Swan Associates, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Swan Associates, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/conservant-systems.jpeg
Conservant Systems
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/swan-associates-inc-.jpeg
Swan Associates, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Swan Associates, Inc. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Conservant Systems company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Swan Associates, Inc. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Conservant Systems company.

In the current year, Swan Associates, Inc. company and Conservant Systems company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Swan Associates, Inc. company nor Conservant Systems company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Swan Associates, Inc. company nor Conservant Systems company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Swan Associates, Inc. company nor Conservant Systems company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Conservant Systems company nor Swan Associates, Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Conservant Systems nor Swan Associates, Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Conservant Systems company nor Swan Associates, Inc. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Swan Associates, Inc. company employs more people globally than Conservant Systems company, reflecting its scale as a HVAC and Refrigeration Equipment Manufacturing.

Neither Conservant Systems nor Swan Associates, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Conservant Systems nor Swan Associates, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Conservant Systems nor Swan Associates, Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Conservant Systems nor Swan Associates, Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Conservant Systems nor Swan Associates, Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Conservant Systems nor Swan Associates, Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H