Comparison Overview

Conservant Systems

VS

Mits Airconditioning Inc.

Conservant Systems

Orange, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28

Winner of the 2016 Department of Energy FEMP JUMP Nationwide Energy Efficiency Competition, as well as the 2014 Department of Defense ESTCP Global Energy Efficiency Competition, Conservant System’s High Efficiency Dehumidification System (HEDS) is currently reducing dehumidification related chiller plant and boiler plant energy consumption by 40% to over 60% while reducing or eliminating biological growth and the associated health, wellness, productivity and hazmat remediation expenses. For retrofits or new construction no other technology compares in efficiency, simplicity, reliability and sustainability.

NAICS: 3334
NAICS Definition: Ventilation, Heating, Air-Conditioning, and Commercial Refrigeration Equipment Manufacturing
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Mits Airconditioning Inc.

1608 Bonhill Rd, Mississauga, L5T 1C7, CA
Last Update:
Between 700 and 749

Founded in 1987 by President, Jack Eliav, Mits Air has grown from a single room operation to an HVAC distribution company with 5 fully stocked branches, 9 distribution warehouses and partner distribution services across North America. Our Mits Air team members include engineers and industry experts, with over 30 years of experience, who work tirelessly to ensure each project reaches its fullest potential, while satisfying each client’s desires. Our team of HVAC experts at Mits Air is specifically trained and structured to assist Consulting Engineers, Architects, Developers, Contractors & Interior Designers in their pursuit of efficient, reliable, cost-effective, innovative, and environmentally friendly HVAC solutions. We specialize in providing HVAC solutions for sophisticated and challenging projects such as high tech computer and server rooms, hospitals, nursing homes, schools, residential buildings, educational institutions and unique sites. We strongly believe in training our customers to ensure end user satisfaction. We are here for our customers and are committed to providing industry leading service and support.

NAICS: 3334
NAICS Definition: Ventilation, Heating, Air-Conditioning, and Commercial Refrigeration Equipment Manufacturing
Employees: 62
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/conservant-systems.jpeg
Conservant Systems
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mitsair.jpeg
Mits Airconditioning Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Conservant Systems
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Mits Airconditioning Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs HVAC and Refrigeration Equipment Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Conservant Systems in 2025.

Incidents vs HVAC and Refrigeration Equipment Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Mits Airconditioning Inc. in 2025.

Incident History — Conservant Systems (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Conservant Systems cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Mits Airconditioning Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Mits Airconditioning Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/conservant-systems.jpeg
Conservant Systems
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mitsair.jpeg
Mits Airconditioning Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Mits Airconditioning Inc. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Conservant Systems company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Mits Airconditioning Inc. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Conservant Systems company.

In the current year, Mits Airconditioning Inc. company and Conservant Systems company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Mits Airconditioning Inc. company nor Conservant Systems company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Mits Airconditioning Inc. company nor Conservant Systems company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Mits Airconditioning Inc. company nor Conservant Systems company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Conservant Systems company nor Mits Airconditioning Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Conservant Systems nor Mits Airconditioning Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Conservant Systems company nor Mits Airconditioning Inc. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Mits Airconditioning Inc. company employs more people globally than Conservant Systems company, reflecting its scale as a HVAC and Refrigeration Equipment Manufacturing.

Neither Conservant Systems nor Mits Airconditioning Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Conservant Systems nor Mits Airconditioning Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Conservant Systems nor Mits Airconditioning Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Conservant Systems nor Mits Airconditioning Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Conservant Systems nor Mits Airconditioning Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Conservant Systems nor Mits Airconditioning Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H