Comparison Overview

Consejo Counseling & Referral Service

VS

Suffolk User Forum

Consejo Counseling & Referral Service

723 SW 10th St, Renton, Washington, 98057, US
Last Update: 2026-01-25
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.consejocounseling.org

Consejo Counseling and Referral Service is a community-based, client-centered behavioral health agency that provides high quality, comprehensive and integrated health care through the provision of mental health, chemical dependency, domestic/intimate partner violence, high-risk youth and sexual assault treatments and advocacy. Consejo brings healing, health, and hope to communities through holistic, culturally competent behavioral health services and advocacy.

NAICS: 621
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 147
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Suffolk User Forum

Unit 3, Grange Business Centre, Ipswich, IP5 2BY, GB
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799
http://www.suffolkuserforum.co.uk

We are an independent mental health user led, involvement, peer support and advocacy organisation. Listening and giving people a voice by opening up conversations about mental health and emotional wellbeing, is at the heart of our organisation. We do this by gathering peoples stories and providing a platform so their stories can be heard. We believe that peoples individual stories empower service user leadership which is essential to improve services and to make a difference to the experience of others. We report peoples’ experiences in our publication ‘Making Our Voice Count’ which is presented to strategic leaders, mental health providers and the Care Quality Commission, informing decision making. We work to ensure mental health care, suicide prevention and wellbeing support is accessible, high quality, supportive, compassionate, and fair. Built on listening to and understanding the lived experience, addressing health, discrimination, and social inequalities. By promoting and enabling meaningful involvement and coproduction between service users, family carers, commissioners, and providers, together we continue to make positive change happen. CW=Content warning where a post may contain distressing information e.g. mention of self harm of suicide.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 15
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/consejo-counseling-&-referral-services.jpeg
Consejo Counseling & Referral Service
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/suffolk-user-forum.jpeg
Suffolk User Forum
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Consejo Counseling & Referral Service
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Suffolk User Forum
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Consejo Counseling & Referral Service in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Suffolk User Forum in 2026.

Incident History — Consejo Counseling & Referral Service (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Consejo Counseling & Referral Service cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Suffolk User Forum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Suffolk User Forum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/consejo-counseling-&-referral-services.jpeg
Consejo Counseling & Referral Service
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/suffolk-user-forum.jpeg
Suffolk User Forum
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Consejo Counseling & Referral Service company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Suffolk User Forum company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Suffolk User Forum company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Consejo Counseling & Referral Service company.

In the current year, Suffolk User Forum company and Consejo Counseling & Referral Service company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Suffolk User Forum company nor Consejo Counseling & Referral Service company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Suffolk User Forum company nor Consejo Counseling & Referral Service company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Suffolk User Forum company nor Consejo Counseling & Referral Service company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Consejo Counseling & Referral Service company nor Suffolk User Forum company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Consejo Counseling & Referral Service nor Suffolk User Forum holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Consejo Counseling & Referral Service company nor Suffolk User Forum company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Consejo Counseling & Referral Service company employs more people globally than Suffolk User Forum company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Consejo Counseling & Referral Service nor Suffolk User Forum holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Consejo Counseling & Referral Service nor Suffolk User Forum holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Consejo Counseling & Referral Service nor Suffolk User Forum holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Consejo Counseling & Referral Service nor Suffolk User Forum holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Consejo Counseling & Referral Service nor Suffolk User Forum holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Consejo Counseling & Referral Service nor Suffolk User Forum holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References
Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References
Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References