Comparison Overview

ConscienHealth

VS

Healthwatch Central Bedfordshire

ConscienHealth

None
Last Update: 2025-11-22

ConscienHealth works with experts and organizations to advance sound approaches to health and obesity, the biggest threat to the health of America in this century. We advocate for evidence-based prevention and treatment. We help organizations develop strategies to advance new options from research to adoption in clinical practice and health policy. We develop strategies that are based on sound science, public policy, and a deep understanding of consumer needs. We help experts and advocates to educate the public and provide a voice for people affected by obesity.

NAICS: 92312
NAICS Definition: Administration of Public Health Programs
Employees: None
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Healthwatch Central Bedfordshire

Capability House, Wrest Park, Silsoe, MK45 4HR, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-27

Our aim is to improve health and social care services in Central Bedfordshire. Call or contact us if you need advice on the health and social care services available. If you have used a service (local doctors’ surgeries, hospitals, dentists, pharmacies, opticians, social care, emergency care and community based health teams), please come to our website and leave feedback, good and bad! You can review as many services as you like, and if you use a service on more than one occasion you can leave feedback each time you visit. We will ask you for a little information about yourself when you leave a review, but if you prefer you can leave a review anonymously. We will summarise your feedback and provide it to the organisations that deliver our health and social care services in Central Bedfordshire, so they can get a clear picture of your experiences when using the services they provide. This will help them encourage and reward good practice, as well as identify and rectify any problems you may encounter. Your voice really could make a difference.

NAICS: 92312
NAICS Definition: Administration of Public Health Programs
Employees: 8
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/conscienhealth.jpeg
ConscienHealth
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/healthwatch-central-bedfordshire.jpeg
Healthwatch Central Bedfordshire
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
ConscienHealth
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Healthwatch Central Bedfordshire
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Public Health Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ConscienHealth in 2025.

Incidents vs Public Health Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Healthwatch Central Bedfordshire in 2025.

Incident History — ConscienHealth (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ConscienHealth cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Healthwatch Central Bedfordshire (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Healthwatch Central Bedfordshire cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/conscienhealth.jpeg
ConscienHealth
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/healthwatch-central-bedfordshire.jpeg
Healthwatch Central Bedfordshire
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

ConscienHealth company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Healthwatch Central Bedfordshire company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Healthwatch Central Bedfordshire company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to ConscienHealth company.

In the current year, Healthwatch Central Bedfordshire company and ConscienHealth company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Healthwatch Central Bedfordshire company nor ConscienHealth company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Healthwatch Central Bedfordshire company nor ConscienHealth company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Healthwatch Central Bedfordshire company nor ConscienHealth company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither ConscienHealth company nor Healthwatch Central Bedfordshire company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither ConscienHealth nor Healthwatch Central Bedfordshire holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

ConscienHealth company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Healthwatch Central Bedfordshire company.

Neither ConscienHealth nor Healthwatch Central Bedfordshire holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither ConscienHealth nor Healthwatch Central Bedfordshire holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither ConscienHealth nor Healthwatch Central Bedfordshire holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither ConscienHealth nor Healthwatch Central Bedfordshire holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither ConscienHealth nor Healthwatch Central Bedfordshire holds HIPAA certification.

Neither ConscienHealth nor Healthwatch Central Bedfordshire holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H