Comparison Overview

Conner Prairie

VS

Roger Williams Park Zoo

Conner Prairie

13400 Allisonville Road, Fishers, 46038, US
Last Update: 2025-12-03
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.connerprairie.org/

Join our team: https://www.connerprairie.org/join-our-team/ Spanning more than 1,000 wooded acres in central Indiana, Conner Prairie welcomes nearly 400,000 visitors of all ages annually. As Indiana’s first Smithsonian Institute affiliate, the museum, located in Fishers, Ind., offers outdoor, historically themed destinations and indoor experiential learning spaces that combine history and art with science, technology, engineering and math to offer an authentic look into history that shapes society today. Visit Conner Prairie online at http://www.connerprairie.org News: https://www.connerprairie.org/about/media-center/ Blog: https://www.connerprairie.org/category/blog/ Conner Prairie is on TikTok, Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, YouTube, Pinterest.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 233
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Roger Williams Park Zoo

1000 Elmwood Avenue, Providence, RI, 02907, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799
http://www.rwpzoo.org

Located amid 40 acres of beautiful woodlands, the Roger Williams Park Zoo provides visitors the opportunity to see animals from all over the globe. The Zoo is home to more than 160 species of animals including a Komodo dragon, as well as zebras, red pandas, African elephants, Masai giraffes, snow leopards, bears, anteaters, flamingoes, sloths, and more! Roger Williams Park Zoo is an accredited member of the Association of Zoos and Aquariums (AZA) and participates in cooperative conservation and breeding programs to help ensure the future survival of many endangered species. The Zoo's mission as leaders in conservation and animal care, is to create engaging experiences that empower guests to join us in conserving wildlife and wild places. Roger Williams Park Zoo is supported and managed by the Rhode Island Zoological Society (a registered 501(c)3 non-profit organization).

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 158
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/conner-prairie.jpeg
Conner Prairie
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/roger-williams-park-zoo.jpeg
Roger Williams Park Zoo
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Conner Prairie
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Roger Williams Park Zoo
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Conner Prairie in 2025.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Roger Williams Park Zoo in 2025.

Incident History — Conner Prairie (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Conner Prairie cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Roger Williams Park Zoo (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Roger Williams Park Zoo cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/conner-prairie.jpeg
Conner Prairie
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/roger-williams-park-zoo.jpeg
Roger Williams Park Zoo
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Conner Prairie company and Roger Williams Park Zoo company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Roger Williams Park Zoo company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Conner Prairie company.

In the current year, Roger Williams Park Zoo company and Conner Prairie company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Roger Williams Park Zoo company nor Conner Prairie company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Roger Williams Park Zoo company nor Conner Prairie company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Roger Williams Park Zoo company nor Conner Prairie company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Conner Prairie company nor Roger Williams Park Zoo company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Conner Prairie nor Roger Williams Park Zoo holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Conner Prairie company nor Roger Williams Park Zoo company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Conner Prairie company employs more people globally than Roger Williams Park Zoo company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Conner Prairie nor Roger Williams Park Zoo holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Conner Prairie nor Roger Williams Park Zoo holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Conner Prairie nor Roger Williams Park Zoo holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Conner Prairie nor Roger Williams Park Zoo holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Conner Prairie nor Roger Williams Park Zoo holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Conner Prairie nor Roger Williams Park Zoo holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ImageMagick is free and open-source software used for editing and manipulating digital images. Prior to 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34, there is a vulnerability in ImageMagick’s Magick++ layer that manifests when Options::fontFamily is invoked with an empty string. Clearing a font family calls RelinquishMagickMemory on _drawInfo->font, freeing the font string but leaving _drawInfo->font pointing to freed memory while _drawInfo->family is set to that (now-invalid) pointer. Any later cleanup or reuse of _drawInfo->font re-frees or dereferences dangling memory. DestroyDrawInfo and other setters (Options::font, Image::font) assume _drawInfo->font remains valid, so destruction or subsequent updates trigger crashes or heap corruption. This vulnerability is fixed in 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
References
Description

FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 has a Remote Code Execution via Unrestricted File Upload in Ad Management. FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 allows authenticated remote attackers to upload files that the server later executes (or stores in an executable location) without sufficient validation, sanitization, or execution restrictions. An authenticated remote attacker can upload a crafted PHP file and cause the application or web server to execute it, resulting in remote code execution (RCE).

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

PHPGurukul Billing System 1.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in the admin/index.php endpoint. Specifically, the username parameter accepts unvalidated user input, which is then concatenated directly into a backend SQL query.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

NMIS/BioDose software V22.02 and previous versions contain executable binaries with plain text hard-coded passwords. These hard-coded passwords could allow unauthorized access to both the application and database.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
cvss4
Base: 8.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

NMIS/BioDose V22.02 and previous versions' installation directory paths by default have insecure file permissions, which in certain deployment scenarios can enable users on client workstations to modify the program executables and libraries.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References