Comparison Overview

Connecticut Color

VS

Printcess

Connecticut Color

US, 06450
Last Update: 2025-12-12
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.connecticutcolor.com

One of the Northeast's fastest growing commercial and direct mail printing companies. In challenging times Connecticut Color has grown from a startup, to one of the regions largest printing companies. We provide a complete solution for web printed products including high volume self mailers, letter mail, direct mail components, spine glued products, in-line web finished products, catalogs, and newspaper inserts, just to name a few. Utilizing both full and half web presses, Connecticut Color delivers high quality, cost effecting printing for companies ranging from small advertising agencies to Fortune 100 companies.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 12
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Printcess

240 Ferrars Street, South Melbourne, VIC, 3205, AU
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799
http://www.printcess.com.au

Printcess is a production based solutions company. Our secret is in our ability to understand the brief and find the best way to produce your project. For this reason, Printcess is different from traditional Print Production Companies. We pride ourselves on fast turnaround, competitive pricing and producing work that will not only meet your expectations but exceed them achieving the three targets of Time, Quality and Cost. We have good long-standing relationships with print houses, installers and designers. Most of our concepts and artwork are produced in house but if a specialist is required we have the contacts to assure you that your work is being handled by professionals. We supply and manage a full service offering logo design, stationery, photography/retouching, finished artwork and printed material such as direct mail, outdoor advertising and total print media needs.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 13
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Connecticut Color
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/printcess.jpeg
Printcess
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Connecticut Color
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Printcess
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Connecticut Color in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Printcess in 2025.

Incident History — Connecticut Color (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Connecticut Color cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Printcess (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Printcess cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Connecticut Color
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/printcess.jpeg
Printcess
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Connecticut Color company and Printcess company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Printcess company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Connecticut Color company.

In the current year, Printcess company and Connecticut Color company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Printcess company nor Connecticut Color company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Printcess company nor Connecticut Color company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Printcess company nor Connecticut Color company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Connecticut Color company nor Printcess company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Connecticut Color nor Printcess holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Connecticut Color company nor Printcess company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Printcess company employs more people globally than Connecticut Color company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Connecticut Color nor Printcess holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Connecticut Color nor Printcess holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Connecticut Color nor Printcess holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Connecticut Color nor Printcess holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Connecticut Color nor Printcess holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Connecticut Color nor Printcess holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References