Comparison Overview

Connecticut's Beardsley Zoo

VS

Historic House Trust of New York City

Connecticut's Beardsley Zoo

1875 Noble Ave, Bridgeport, 06610, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://beardsleyzoo.org

Connecticut's Beardsley Zoo is the state's only zoo - providing wild experiences for more than 100 years. Visit more than 350 species of primarily North and South American animals, including Amur tiger and leopards, Brazilian ocelot, Mexican wolves, and golden Lion tamarins. Highlights include our new Andean bear habitat, spider monkey habitat, Natt Family Red Panda Habitat, South American rainforest with free-flight aviary, the prairie dog exhibit with "pop-up"​ viewing areas, the New England Farmyard with goats, cows, pigs, and other barnyard favorites, plus the hoofstock trail featuring bison, deer, and more.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 59
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Historic House Trust of New York City

117-02 Roosevelt Avenue, Flushing, NY, 11368, US
Last Update: 2026-01-13
Between 750 and 799
http://www.historichousetrust.org

In partnership with NYC Parks, the Historic House Trust advocates for, promotes, and provides expertise to preserve 23 publicly owned historic sites located throughout New York City’s five boroughs. Located on public parkland, our 23 partner historic sites are open to all and are instrumental in creating engaging programs for their surrounding communities. Ranging from modest farms to grand mansions, these landmark sites provide essential windows into the lives of all New Yorkers, past and present. We are a team of historic preservation professionals that believe the structural integrity of historic buildings is the foundation of telling New York’s diverse stories. We believe historic sites are not static antiquities – they are living institutions uniquely poised to address current issues in their communities and the world while retaining their connections to the past.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 8
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/connecticut's-beardsley-zoo.jpeg
Connecticut's Beardsley Zoo
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/historic-house-trust-of-new-york-city.jpeg
Historic House Trust of New York City
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Connecticut's Beardsley Zoo
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Historic House Trust of New York City
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Connecticut's Beardsley Zoo in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Historic House Trust of New York City in 2026.

Incident History — Connecticut's Beardsley Zoo (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Connecticut's Beardsley Zoo cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Historic House Trust of New York City (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Historic House Trust of New York City cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/connecticut's-beardsley-zoo.jpeg
Connecticut's Beardsley Zoo
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/historic-house-trust-of-new-york-city.jpeg
Historic House Trust of New York City
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Connecticut's Beardsley Zoo company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Historic House Trust of New York City company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Historic House Trust of New York City company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Connecticut's Beardsley Zoo company.

In the current year, Historic House Trust of New York City company and Connecticut's Beardsley Zoo company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Historic House Trust of New York City company nor Connecticut's Beardsley Zoo company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Historic House Trust of New York City company nor Connecticut's Beardsley Zoo company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Historic House Trust of New York City company nor Connecticut's Beardsley Zoo company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Connecticut's Beardsley Zoo company nor Historic House Trust of New York City company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Connecticut's Beardsley Zoo nor Historic House Trust of New York City holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Connecticut's Beardsley Zoo company nor Historic House Trust of New York City company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Connecticut's Beardsley Zoo company employs more people globally than Historic House Trust of New York City company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Connecticut's Beardsley Zoo nor Historic House Trust of New York City holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Connecticut's Beardsley Zoo nor Historic House Trust of New York City holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Connecticut's Beardsley Zoo nor Historic House Trust of New York City holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Connecticut's Beardsley Zoo nor Historic House Trust of New York City holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Connecticut's Beardsley Zoo nor Historic House Trust of New York City holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Connecticut's Beardsley Zoo nor Historic House Trust of New York City holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References