Comparison Overview

Connecticut's Beardsley Zoo

VS

Virginia Aquarium & Marine Science Center

Connecticut's Beardsley Zoo

1875 Noble Ave, Bridgeport, 06610, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

Connecticut's Beardsley Zoo is the state's only zoo - providing wild experiences for more than 100 years. Visit more than 350 species of primarily North and South American animals, including Amur tiger and leopards, Brazilian ocelot, Mexican wolves, and golden Lion tamarins. Highlights include our new Andean bear habitat, spider monkey habitat, Natt Family Red Panda Habitat, South American rainforest with free-flight aviary, the prairie dog exhibit with "pop-up"​ viewing areas, the New England Farmyard with goats, cows, pigs, and other barnyard favorites, plus the hoofstock trail featuring bison, deer, and more.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 59
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Virginia Aquarium & Marine Science Center

717 General Booth Blvd., Virginia Beach, Virginia 23451, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22

Our mission is to connect people to the marine environment, inspiring a more sustainable future. We aspire to be a driver in conservation, education, tourism, and sustainability, leading the charge to save wildlife and their ecosystems. The Virginia Aquarium & Marine Science Center features thousands of animals representing over 300 species. With more than 800,000 gallons of aquariums, we have animal habitats, interactive exhibits, education stations, boat tours, a Nature Trail, and more! For job opportunities go to: https://virginiabeach.gov/careers

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 194
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/connecticut's-beardsley-zoo.jpeg
Connecticut's Beardsley Zoo
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/virginia-aquarium-&-marine-science-center.jpeg
Virginia Aquarium & Marine Science Center
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Connecticut's Beardsley Zoo
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Virginia Aquarium & Marine Science Center
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Connecticut's Beardsley Zoo in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Virginia Aquarium & Marine Science Center in 2026.

Incident History — Connecticut's Beardsley Zoo (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Connecticut's Beardsley Zoo cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Virginia Aquarium & Marine Science Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Virginia Aquarium & Marine Science Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/connecticut's-beardsley-zoo.jpeg
Connecticut's Beardsley Zoo
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/virginia-aquarium-&-marine-science-center.jpeg
Virginia Aquarium & Marine Science Center
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Virginia Aquarium & Marine Science Center company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Connecticut's Beardsley Zoo company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Virginia Aquarium & Marine Science Center company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Connecticut's Beardsley Zoo company.

In the current year, Virginia Aquarium & Marine Science Center company and Connecticut's Beardsley Zoo company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Virginia Aquarium & Marine Science Center company nor Connecticut's Beardsley Zoo company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Virginia Aquarium & Marine Science Center company nor Connecticut's Beardsley Zoo company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Virginia Aquarium & Marine Science Center company nor Connecticut's Beardsley Zoo company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Connecticut's Beardsley Zoo company nor Virginia Aquarium & Marine Science Center company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Connecticut's Beardsley Zoo nor Virginia Aquarium & Marine Science Center holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Connecticut's Beardsley Zoo company nor Virginia Aquarium & Marine Science Center company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Virginia Aquarium & Marine Science Center company employs more people globally than Connecticut's Beardsley Zoo company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Connecticut's Beardsley Zoo nor Virginia Aquarium & Marine Science Center holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Connecticut's Beardsley Zoo nor Virginia Aquarium & Marine Science Center holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Connecticut's Beardsley Zoo nor Virginia Aquarium & Marine Science Center holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Connecticut's Beardsley Zoo nor Virginia Aquarium & Marine Science Center holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Connecticut's Beardsley Zoo nor Virginia Aquarium & Marine Science Center holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Connecticut's Beardsley Zoo nor Virginia Aquarium & Marine Science Center holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H