Comparison Overview

Conjunctions

VS

Personnel Concepts

Conjunctions

30 Campus Rd, Annandale-on-Hudson, New York, 12504, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Founded in 1981 by novelist Bradford Morrow and San Francisco Renaissance poet Kenneth Rexroth, Conjunctions publishes innovative fiction, poetry, and narrative nonfiction by emerging voices and contemporary masters in biannual print/ebook editions and a weekly online magazine. Conjunctions serves those who read dangerously and write fearlessly, challenging accepted forms and styles with equal emphasis on groundbreaking experimentation and rigorous quality. The journal's initial publishers included Godine, Collier, and Scribner, before Bard College became Conjunctions’ publisher in 1990. The print anthology appears every spring and fall, collecting pieces that form a conversation around a central theme.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Personnel Concepts

undefined, undefined, undefined, undefined, US
Last Update: 2025-11-23

For over 30 years, Personnel Concepts has been the leading industry authority in federal and state labor law poster compliance products. From our innovative Space Saver All-On-One Posters to our workplace safety and HR recordkeeping products, we help protect your company from government fines, employee lawsuits, and other costly consequences associated with non-compliance.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 113
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/conjunctions.jpeg
Conjunctions
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/personnel-concepts.jpeg
Personnel Concepts
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Conjunctions
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Personnel Concepts
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Conjunctions in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Personnel Concepts in 2025.

Incident History — Conjunctions (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Conjunctions cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Personnel Concepts (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Personnel Concepts cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/conjunctions.jpeg
Conjunctions
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/personnel-concepts.jpeg
Personnel Concepts
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Personnel Concepts company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Conjunctions company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Personnel Concepts company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Conjunctions company.

In the current year, Personnel Concepts company and Conjunctions company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Personnel Concepts company nor Conjunctions company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Personnel Concepts company nor Conjunctions company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Personnel Concepts company nor Conjunctions company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Conjunctions company nor Personnel Concepts company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Conjunctions nor Personnel Concepts holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Conjunctions company nor Personnel Concepts company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Personnel Concepts company employs more people globally than Conjunctions company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither Conjunctions nor Personnel Concepts holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Conjunctions nor Personnel Concepts holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Conjunctions nor Personnel Concepts holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Conjunctions nor Personnel Concepts holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Conjunctions nor Personnel Concepts holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Conjunctions nor Personnel Concepts holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.