Comparison Overview

Conifer Health Solutions

VS

University Hospitals Connor Integrative Health Network

Conifer Health Solutions

3560 Dallas Parkway, Frisco, 75034, US
Last Update: 2026-01-21
Between 650 and 699

For over 35 years, Conifer Health has partnered with health systems, hospitals, physician groups, and employers to deliver tailored, technology-enabled revenue cycle and value-based care solutions that improve financial performance, enhance the care experience, and reduce the cost to collect. Supporting more than 600 clients and managing over $32 billion in NPR annually, we operate with a “by operators, for operators” mindset — combining deep operational expertise with intelligent automation, advanced analytics, and a mature global delivery model. Our commitment is simple: deliver on client goals with full transparency and measurable outcomes at every step.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 7,666
Subsidiaries: 43
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
6
Attack type number
2

University Hospitals Connor Integrative Health Network

25001 Emery Rd., Bldg 25E, Suite 100, Warrensville Heights, OH, US, 44128
Last Update: 2026-01-18

Integrative Medicine (IM) is an approach to healthcare that takes into account the whole person addressing the full range of physical, emotional, mental, social, spiritual, and environmental influences that affect an individual’s health. IM is informed by evidence, makes use of all appropriate therapies, and emphasizes that the patient and practitioner are partners in the healing process. At University Hospitals Connor Whole Health, we offer IM therapies that work in concert with traditional medical treatments to heal the mind, body, and spirit. Employing a personalized strategy that considers the patient’s unique circumstances, we use the most appropriate interventions from an array of scientific disciplines to heal illness and disease and help people attain optimum health.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 19,286
Subsidiaries: 7
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
3
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/conifer-health-solutions.jpeg
Conifer Health Solutions
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/university-hospitals-connor-whole-health.jpeg
University Hospitals Connor Integrative Health Network
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Conifer Health Solutions
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
University Hospitals Connor Integrative Health Network
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Conifer Health Solutions in 2026.

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for University Hospitals Connor Integrative Health Network in 2026.

Incident History — Conifer Health Solutions (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Conifer Health Solutions cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — University Hospitals Connor Integrative Health Network (X = Date, Y = Severity)

University Hospitals Connor Integrative Health Network cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/conifer-health-solutions.jpeg
Conifer Health Solutions
Incidents

Date Detected: 8/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Business Email Compromise (BEC)
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 08/2022
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Email Account Compromise
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 06/2022
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Malicious Code Injection
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/university-hospitals-connor-whole-health.jpeg
University Hospitals Connor Integrative Health Network
Incidents

Date Detected: 11/2021
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access/Disclosure
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 1/2016
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 07/2015
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Insider Threat
Blog: Blog

FAQ

University Hospitals Connor Integrative Health Network company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Conifer Health Solutions company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Conifer Health Solutions company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to University Hospitals Connor Integrative Health Network company.

In the current year, University Hospitals Connor Integrative Health Network company and Conifer Health Solutions company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Conifer Health Solutions company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while University Hospitals Connor Integrative Health Network company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Both University Hospitals Connor Integrative Health Network company and Conifer Health Solutions company have disclosed experiencing at least one data breach.

Neither University Hospitals Connor Integrative Health Network company nor Conifer Health Solutions company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Conifer Health Solutions company nor University Hospitals Connor Integrative Health Network company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Conifer Health Solutions nor University Hospitals Connor Integrative Health Network holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Conifer Health Solutions company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to University Hospitals Connor Integrative Health Network company.

University Hospitals Connor Integrative Health Network company employs more people globally than Conifer Health Solutions company, reflecting its scale as a Hospitals and Health Care.

Neither Conifer Health Solutions nor University Hospitals Connor Integrative Health Network holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Conifer Health Solutions nor University Hospitals Connor Integrative Health Network holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Conifer Health Solutions nor University Hospitals Connor Integrative Health Network holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Conifer Health Solutions nor University Hospitals Connor Integrative Health Network holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Conifer Health Solutions nor University Hospitals Connor Integrative Health Network holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Conifer Health Solutions nor University Hospitals Connor Integrative Health Network holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

SummaryA command injection vulnerability (CWE-78) has been found to exist in the `wrangler pages deploy` command. The issue occurs because the `--commit-hash` parameter is passed directly to a shell command without proper validation or sanitization, allowing an attacker with control of `--commit-hash` to execute arbitrary commands on the system running Wrangler. Root causeThe commitHash variable, derived from user input via the --commit-hash CLI argument, is interpolated directly into a shell command using template literals (e.g.,  execSync(`git show -s --format=%B ${commitHash}`)). Shell metacharacters are interpreted by the shell, enabling command execution. ImpactThis vulnerability is generally hard to exploit, as it requires --commit-hash to be attacker controlled. The vulnerability primarily affects CI/CD environments where `wrangler pages deploy` is used in automated pipelines and the --commit-hash parameter is populated from external, potentially untrusted sources. An attacker could exploit this to: * Run any shell command. * Exfiltrate environment variables. * Compromise the CI runner to install backdoors or modify build artifacts. Credits Disclosed responsibly by kny4hacker. Mitigation * Wrangler v4 users are requested to upgrade to Wrangler v4.59.1 or higher. * Wrangler v3 users are requested to upgrade to Wrangler v3.114.17 or higher. * Users on Wrangler v2 (EOL) should upgrade to a supported major version.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Core). Supported versions that are affected are 7.1.14 and 7.2.4. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox executes to compromise Oracle VM VirtualBox. While the vulnerability is in Oracle VM VirtualBox, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle VM VirtualBox. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.2 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Core). Supported versions that are affected are 7.1.14 and 7.2.4. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox executes to compromise Oracle VM VirtualBox. While the vulnerability is in Oracle VM VirtualBox, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized creation, deletion or modification access to critical data or all Oracle VM VirtualBox accessible data as well as unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle VM VirtualBox accessible data and unauthorized ability to cause a partial denial of service (partial DOS) of Oracle VM VirtualBox. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.1 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L
Description

Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Core). Supported versions that are affected are 7.1.14 and 7.2.4. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox executes to compromise Oracle VM VirtualBox. While the vulnerability is in Oracle VM VirtualBox, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle VM VirtualBox. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.2 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Core). Supported versions that are affected are 7.1.14 and 7.2.4. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox executes to compromise Oracle VM VirtualBox. While the vulnerability is in Oracle VM VirtualBox, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle VM VirtualBox. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.2 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H