Comparison Overview

Confidant Health

VS

Beth Israel Lahey Health

Confidant Health

None
Last Update: 2025-12-11
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.ConfidantHealth.com

Confidant Health is a Distributed Quality Network delivering high-quality behavioral healthcare at scale. We support large healthcare organizations as a bolt-on behavioral health solution. Our focus on rapid access and personalized care delivers excellent results for partner's patient populations. What's in our secret sauce for delivering great patient outcomes? Our cutting edge technology platform makes Confidant the place where providers want to practice, and where the care they deliver is the most effective. The Confidant Health platform is a technology-enabled framework for care delivery. It replaces old school EMRs with an intuitive AI-powered experience that automates away non-clinical tasks and empowers providers to deliver personalized care across their case load. Confidant's multi-disciplinary provider network is setting a new standard for behavioral healthcare.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 25
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
View Profile

Beth Israel Lahey Health

None
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799
https://www.bilh.org

Beth Israel Lahey Health is a new, integrated system providing patients with better care wherever they are. Care informed by world-class research and education. We are doctors and nurses, technicians and social workers, innovators and educators, and so many others. All with a shared vision for what health care can and should be.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 28,316
Subsidiaries: 13
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
2

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/confidanthealth.jpeg
Confidant Health
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/beth-israel-lahey-health.jpeg
Beth Israel Lahey Health
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Confidant Health
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Beth Israel Lahey Health
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Confidant Health in 2025.

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Beth Israel Lahey Health in 2025.

Incident History — Confidant Health (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Confidant Health cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Beth Israel Lahey Health (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Beth Israel Lahey Health cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/confidanthealth.jpeg
Confidant Health
Incidents

Date Detected: 9/2024
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Misconfigured Database
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/beth-israel-lahey-health.jpeg
Beth Israel Lahey Health
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2023
Type:Cyber Attack
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 07/2014
Type:Data Leak
Attack Vector: Physical Theft
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Beth Israel Lahey Health company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Confidant Health company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Beth Israel Lahey Health company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to Confidant Health company.

In the current year, Beth Israel Lahey Health company and Confidant Health company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Beth Israel Lahey Health company nor Confidant Health company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Beth Israel Lahey Health company nor Confidant Health company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Beth Israel Lahey Health company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Confidant Health company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Confidant Health company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while Beth Israel Lahey Health company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Confidant Health nor Beth Israel Lahey Health holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Beth Israel Lahey Health company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Confidant Health company.

Beth Israel Lahey Health company employs more people globally than Confidant Health company, reflecting its scale as a Hospitals and Health Care.

Neither Confidant Health nor Beth Israel Lahey Health holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Confidant Health nor Beth Israel Lahey Health holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Confidant Health nor Beth Israel Lahey Health holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Confidant Health nor Beth Israel Lahey Health holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Confidant Health nor Beth Israel Lahey Health holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Confidant Health nor Beth Israel Lahey Health holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References