Comparison Overview

Confederation of Swedish Enterprise

VS

Shared Value Project

Confederation of Swedish Enterprise

Storgatan 19, Stockholm, 114 82, SE
Last Update: 2025-12-02

The voice of Sweden's employers. The Confederation of Swedish Enterprise (Svenskt Näringsliv) is Sweden’s largest and most influential business federation representing 50 member organizations and 55,000 member companies with some 1.5 million employees. It was founded in 2001 through the merger between the Swedish Employers’ Confederation (SAF, founded in 1902) and the Federation of Swedish Industry (SI, founded in 1910).

NAICS: 54172
NAICS Definition: Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities
Employees: 91
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Shared Value Project

27-33 Raglan Street, Melbourne, VIC, 3025, AU
Last Update: 2025-12-03

The Shared Value Project is a regional community of practice committed to driving adoption and implementation of shared value strategies among leaders and companies, civil society, and government organisations in Australia. The Shared Value Project aims to create a community of business leaders and practitioners in Australia who are dedicated to advancing shared value as the business strategy for solving societal problems. The Shared Value Project supports the development of shared value in Australia via the creation of knowledge, skills and social networks, and by the promotion of member achievements. Shared value is defined as policies and practices that enhance the competitiveness of companies while improving social and environmental conditions in the regions where they operate. It is a business strategy focused on companies creating measurable economic benefit by identifying and addressing social problems that intersect with their business. To qualify as shared value, there must be an identifiable economic benefit to the company as well as measurable impact on a social or environmental issue.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 15
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/confederation-of-swedish-enterprise.jpeg
Confederation of Swedish Enterprise
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/shared-value-project.jpeg
Shared Value Project
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Confederation of Swedish Enterprise
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Shared Value Project
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Confederation of Swedish Enterprise in 2025.

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Shared Value Project in 2025.

Incident History — Confederation of Swedish Enterprise (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Confederation of Swedish Enterprise cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Shared Value Project (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Shared Value Project cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/confederation-of-swedish-enterprise.jpeg
Confederation of Swedish Enterprise
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/shared-value-project.jpeg
Shared Value Project
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Confederation of Swedish Enterprise company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Shared Value Project company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Shared Value Project company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Confederation of Swedish Enterprise company.

In the current year, Shared Value Project company and Confederation of Swedish Enterprise company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Shared Value Project company nor Confederation of Swedish Enterprise company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Shared Value Project company nor Confederation of Swedish Enterprise company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Shared Value Project company nor Confederation of Swedish Enterprise company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Confederation of Swedish Enterprise company nor Shared Value Project company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Confederation of Swedish Enterprise nor Shared Value Project holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Shared Value Project company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Confederation of Swedish Enterprise company.

Confederation of Swedish Enterprise company employs more people globally than Shared Value Project company, reflecting its scale as a Think Tanks.

Neither Confederation of Swedish Enterprise nor Shared Value Project holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Confederation of Swedish Enterprise nor Shared Value Project holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Confederation of Swedish Enterprise nor Shared Value Project holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Confederation of Swedish Enterprise nor Shared Value Project holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Confederation of Swedish Enterprise nor Shared Value Project holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Confederation of Swedish Enterprise nor Shared Value Project holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

MCP Server Kubernetes is an MCP Server that can connect to a Kubernetes cluster and manage it. Prior to 2.9.8, there is a security issue exists in the exec_in_pod tool of the mcp-server-kubernetes MCP Server. The tool accepts user-provided commands in both array and string formats. When a string format is provided, it is passed directly to shell interpretation (sh -c) without input validation, allowing shell metacharacters to be interpreted. This vulnerability can be exploited through direct command injection or indirect prompt injection attacks, where AI agents may execute commands without explicit user intent. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.9.8.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

XML external entity (XXE) injection in eyoucms v1.7.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via crafted body of a POST request.

Description

An issue was discovered in Fanvil x210 V2 2.12.20 allowing unauthenticated attackers on the local network to access administrative functions of the device (e.g. file upload, firmware update, reboot...) via a crafted authentication bypass.

Description

Cal.com is open-source scheduling software. Prior to 5.9.8, A flaw in the login credentials provider allows an attacker to bypass password verification when a TOTP code is provided, potentially gaining unauthorized access to user accounts. This issue exists due to problematic conditional logic in the authentication flow. This vulnerability is fixed in 5.9.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Rhino is an open-source implementation of JavaScript written entirely in Java. Prior to 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1, when an application passed an attacker controlled float poing number into the toFixed() function, it might lead to high CPU consumption and a potential Denial of Service. Small numbers go through this call stack: NativeNumber.numTo > DToA.JS_dtostr > DToA.JS_dtoa > DToA.pow5mult where pow5mult attempts to raise 5 to a ridiculous power. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X