Comparison Overview

Concord

VS

Tata Elxsi

Concord

509 2nd Avenue South, Minneapolis, MN, 55343, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 700 and 749

Concord is a technology consultancy building connected customer experiences backed by powerful AI & analytics and underpinned by secure IT foundations. Digital Experience | Data & Analytics | Engineering & Applications

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 563
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Tata Elxsi

ITBP Road, Whitefield, Bangalore, Karnataka, IN, 560 048
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

Tata Elxsi is amongst the world’s leading providers of design and technology services across industries, including Automotive, Media & Entertainment, Communications, and Healthcare. Tata Elxsi is helping customers reimagine their products and services through design thinking and the application of digital technologies such as IoT (Internet of Things), Cloud, Mobility, Virtual Reality, and Artificial Intelligence. Tata Elxsi is truly home to a billion possibilities. We believe in opportunities for everyone - to be bold, and curious and seek to shape the future. Explore what’s possible, discover what you love to do, and find accelerated paths for growth. At Tata Elxsi, you matter.

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 16,059
Subsidiaries: 53
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
3

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/concord.jpeg
Concord
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tataelxsi.jpeg
Tata Elxsi
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Concord
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Tata Elxsi
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Concord in 2025.

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Tata Elxsi in 2025.

Incident History — Concord (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Concord cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Tata Elxsi (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tata Elxsi cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/concord.jpeg
Concord
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2019
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Physical Theft
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tataelxsi.jpeg
Tata Elxsi
Incidents

Date Detected: 11/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 11/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Motivation: Financial Gain, Disruption
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 10/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Phishing Emails, Spoofed Supplier Communications, WhatsApp Scams, Human Error (Misplaced Trust)
Motivation: Financial Gain, Data Theft, Reputational Damage, Exploitation of Human Behavior
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Tata Elxsi company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Concord company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Tata Elxsi company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to Concord company.

In the current year, Tata Elxsi company has reported more cyber incidents than Concord company.

Tata Elxsi company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Concord company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Both Tata Elxsi company and Concord company have disclosed experiencing at least one data breach.

Tata Elxsi company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Concord company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Concord company nor Tata Elxsi company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Concord nor Tata Elxsi holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Tata Elxsi company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Concord company.

Tata Elxsi company employs more people globally than Concord company, reflecting its scale as a IT Services and IT Consulting.

Neither Concord nor Tata Elxsi holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Concord nor Tata Elxsi holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Concord nor Tata Elxsi holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Concord nor Tata Elxsi holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Concord nor Tata Elxsi holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Concord nor Tata Elxsi holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

httparty is an API tool. In versions 0.23.2 and prior, httparty is vulnerable to SSRF. This issue can pose a risk of leaking API keys, and it can also allow third parties to issue requests to internal servers. This issue has been patched via commit 0529bcd.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

5ire is a cross-platform desktop artificial intelligence assistant and model context protocol client. In versions 0.15.2 and prior, an RCE vulnerability exists in useMarkdown.ts, where the markdown-it-mermaid plugin is initialized with securityLevel: 'loose'. This configuration explicitly permits the rendering of HTML tags within Mermaid diagram nodes. This issue has not been patched at time of publication.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

continuwuity is a Matrix homeserver written in Rust. Prior to version 0.5.0, this vulnerability allows a remote, unauthenticated attacker to force the target server to cryptographically sign arbitrary membership events. The flaw exists because the server fails to validate the origin of a signing request, provided the event's state_key is a valid user ID belonging to the target server. This issue has been patched in version 0.5.0. A workaround for this issue involves blocking access to the PUT /_matrix/federation/v2/invite/{roomId}/{eventId} endpoint using the reverse proxy.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:L/SA:L/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

LangChain is a framework for building LLM-powered applications. Prior to @langchain/core versions 0.3.80 and 1.1.8, and prior to langchain versions 0.3.37 and 1.2.3, a serialization injection vulnerability exists in LangChain JS's toJSON() method (and subsequently when string-ifying objects using JSON.stringify(). The method did not escape objects with 'lc' keys when serializing free-form data in kwargs. The 'lc' key is used internally by LangChain to mark serialized objects. When user-controlled data contains this key structure, it is treated as a legitimate LangChain object during deserialization rather than plain user data. This issue has been patched in @langchain/core versions 0.3.80 and 1.1.8, and langchain versions 0.3.37 and 1.2.3

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

LangChain is a framework for building agents and LLM-powered applications. Prior to versions 0.3.81 and 1.2.5, a serialization injection vulnerability exists in LangChain's dumps() and dumpd() functions. The functions do not escape dictionaries with 'lc' keys when serializing free-form dictionaries. The 'lc' key is used internally by LangChain to mark serialized objects. When user-controlled data contains this key structure, it is treated as a legitimate LangChain object during deserialization rather than plain user data. This issue has been patched in versions 0.3.81 and 1.2.5.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N