Comparison Overview

Concord

VS

Infosys BPM

Concord

509 2nd Avenue South, Minneapolis, MN, 55343, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 700 and 749

Concord is a technology consultancy building connected customer experiences backed by powerful AI & analytics and underpinned by secure IT foundations. Digital Experience | Data & Analytics | Engineering & Applications

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 563
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Infosys BPM

Infosys BPM Limited, Plot no 26/3, 26/4, 26/6, Hosur Road, Electronics City, None, Bengaluru, Karnataka, IN, 560100
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 800 and 849

Infosys BPM Ltd., the business process management subsidiary of Infosys Ltd. (NYSE: INFY), was set up in April 2002. Infosys BPM focuses on integrated end-to-end outsourcing and delivers transformational benefits to its clients through reduced costs, ongoing productivity improvements, and process re-engineering. Infosys BPM operates in India, Poland, the Czech Republic, the Netherlands, Ireland, South Africa, Brazil, Mexico, Costa Rica, the United States, Puerto Rico, China, the Philippines, Singapore, and Australia. Infosys BPM has been consistently ranked among the leading BPM companies and has received over 60 awards and recognitions in the last 5 years from key industry bodies and forums like the International Association of Outsourcing Professionals, Outsourcing Center, SSON, and NOA, among others. Infosys BPM also has very robust people practices, as substantiated by the various HR-specific awards it has won over the years. The company has consistently been ranked among the top employers of choice, on the basis of its industry-leading HR best practices. The company’s senior leaders contribute widely to industry forums as BPO strategists.

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 41,762
Subsidiaries: 4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/concord.jpeg
Concord
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/infosys-bpm.jpeg
Infosys BPM
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Concord
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Infosys BPM
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Concord in 2025.

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Infosys BPM in 2025.

Incident History — Concord (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Concord cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Infosys BPM (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Infosys BPM cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/concord.jpeg
Concord
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2019
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Physical Theft
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/infosys-bpm.jpeg
Infosys BPM
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2024
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: Ransomware
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 11/2023
Type:Ransomware
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 10/2023
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: Ransomware
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Infosys BPM company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Concord company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Infosys BPM company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to Concord company.

In the current year, Infosys BPM company and Concord company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Infosys BPM company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Concord company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Concord company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Infosys BPM company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Infosys BPM company nor Concord company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Concord company nor Infosys BPM company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Concord nor Infosys BPM holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Infosys BPM company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Concord company.

Infosys BPM company employs more people globally than Concord company, reflecting its scale as a IT Services and IT Consulting.

Neither Concord nor Infosys BPM holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Concord nor Infosys BPM holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Concord nor Infosys BPM holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Concord nor Infosys BPM holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Concord nor Infosys BPM holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Concord nor Infosys BPM holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

httparty is an API tool. In versions 0.23.2 and prior, httparty is vulnerable to SSRF. This issue can pose a risk of leaking API keys, and it can also allow third parties to issue requests to internal servers. This issue has been patched via commit 0529bcd.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

5ire is a cross-platform desktop artificial intelligence assistant and model context protocol client. In versions 0.15.2 and prior, an RCE vulnerability exists in useMarkdown.ts, where the markdown-it-mermaid plugin is initialized with securityLevel: 'loose'. This configuration explicitly permits the rendering of HTML tags within Mermaid diagram nodes. This issue has not been patched at time of publication.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

continuwuity is a Matrix homeserver written in Rust. Prior to version 0.5.0, this vulnerability allows a remote, unauthenticated attacker to force the target server to cryptographically sign arbitrary membership events. The flaw exists because the server fails to validate the origin of a signing request, provided the event's state_key is a valid user ID belonging to the target server. This issue has been patched in version 0.5.0. A workaround for this issue involves blocking access to the PUT /_matrix/federation/v2/invite/{roomId}/{eventId} endpoint using the reverse proxy.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:L/SA:L/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

LangChain is a framework for building LLM-powered applications. Prior to @langchain/core versions 0.3.80 and 1.1.8, and prior to langchain versions 0.3.37 and 1.2.3, a serialization injection vulnerability exists in LangChain JS's toJSON() method (and subsequently when string-ifying objects using JSON.stringify(). The method did not escape objects with 'lc' keys when serializing free-form data in kwargs. The 'lc' key is used internally by LangChain to mark serialized objects. When user-controlled data contains this key structure, it is treated as a legitimate LangChain object during deserialization rather than plain user data. This issue has been patched in @langchain/core versions 0.3.80 and 1.1.8, and langchain versions 0.3.37 and 1.2.3

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

LangChain is a framework for building agents and LLM-powered applications. Prior to versions 0.3.81 and 1.2.5, a serialization injection vulnerability exists in LangChain's dumps() and dumpd() functions. The functions do not escape dictionaries with 'lc' keys when serializing free-form dictionaries. The 'lc' key is used internally by LangChain to mark serialized objects. When user-controlled data contains this key structure, it is treated as a legitimate LangChain object during deserialization rather than plain user data. This issue has been patched in versions 0.3.81 and 1.2.5.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N