Comparison Overview

Concierge Marketing Inc.

VS

Scan Client Publishing

Concierge Marketing Inc.

13518 L. Street, Omaha, NE, 68137, US
Last Update: 2025-11-25
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.conciergemarketing.com

We are a micro-publishing incubator. We help independent authors create their publishing company, produce their work of exceptional quality, and market it to their customers and the media. We specialize in non-fiction books and children's books. We work with agencies, small publishers, independent authors and those just aspiring to write their dream!

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Scan Client Publishing

News Building, 3 London Bridge Street, London, undefined, SE1 9SG, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799
http://www.scanclientpublishing.com

Scan Client Publishing Trading since 2008, the company has experienced rapid growth and is currently on a continued path of expansion. The venture began with the launch of Scan Magazine which was rapidly followed by the launch of consumer shows at Earls Court and Olympia. Today the company operates a portfolio of magazines, events, market research and lead generation business. Our philosophy is simply to expand constantly and enhance our current business portfolio by developing existing brands and launching dynamic new ventures.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 17
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/concierge-marketing-inc..jpeg
Concierge Marketing Inc.
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/scan-magazine.jpeg
Scan Client Publishing
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Concierge Marketing Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Scan Client Publishing
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Concierge Marketing Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Scan Client Publishing in 2025.

Incident History — Concierge Marketing Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Concierge Marketing Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Scan Client Publishing (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Scan Client Publishing cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/concierge-marketing-inc..jpeg
Concierge Marketing Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/scan-magazine.jpeg
Scan Client Publishing
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Concierge Marketing Inc. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Scan Client Publishing company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Scan Client Publishing company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Concierge Marketing Inc. company.

In the current year, Scan Client Publishing company and Concierge Marketing Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Scan Client Publishing company nor Concierge Marketing Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Scan Client Publishing company nor Concierge Marketing Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Scan Client Publishing company nor Concierge Marketing Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Concierge Marketing Inc. company nor Scan Client Publishing company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Concierge Marketing Inc. nor Scan Client Publishing holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Concierge Marketing Inc. company nor Scan Client Publishing company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Scan Client Publishing company employs more people globally than Concierge Marketing Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither Concierge Marketing Inc. nor Scan Client Publishing holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Concierge Marketing Inc. nor Scan Client Publishing holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Concierge Marketing Inc. nor Scan Client Publishing holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Concierge Marketing Inc. nor Scan Client Publishing holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Concierge Marketing Inc. nor Scan Client Publishing holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Concierge Marketing Inc. nor Scan Client Publishing holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References
Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References