Comparison Overview

Conard House

VS

Firetree Ltd.

Conard House

1385 Mission Street Suite 200, San Francisco, California, 94103, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

For over 60 years, Conard House has provided effective, community-based resources for San Francisco's vulnerable adults living with serious mental illness. Every day, clients working with our skilled team find healthy pathways to recovery, and utilize those resources — including a combination of counseling, treatment, programs and other services — in order to self-manage chronic medical and mental illnesses. Each year, Conard House serves more than 2,000 vulnerable adults.

NAICS: 621
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 117
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Firetree Ltd.

800 West Fourth Street, Williamsport, PA, 17701, US
Last Update: 2026-01-21
Between 750 and 799

Firetree, Ltd. was formed in 1991 as a non-profit 501 (c) (3) corporation designed to provide quality transitional services to individuals associated with the criminal justice system. Statistically, chemical abuse is an indirect or direct cause of criminal behavior in approximately 90 % of the prison population; however, a minimal number of offenders were receiving substance abuse treatment. Firetree, Ltd. developed the belief and the mission, that drug and alcohol treatment is essential to effect change in the criminal offender. It wasn’t long before serving those who are chemically dependent but not yet involved in the criminal justice system was recognized as yet another area of need.

NAICS: 621
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 103
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/conard-house-inc..jpeg
Conard House
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/firetree-ltd-.jpeg
Firetree Ltd.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Conard House
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Firetree Ltd.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Conard House in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Firetree Ltd. in 2026.

Incident History — Conard House (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Conard House cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Firetree Ltd. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Firetree Ltd. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/conard-house-inc..jpeg
Conard House
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/firetree-ltd-.jpeg
Firetree Ltd.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Firetree Ltd. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Conard House company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Firetree Ltd. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Conard House company.

In the current year, Firetree Ltd. company and Conard House company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Firetree Ltd. company nor Conard House company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Firetree Ltd. company nor Conard House company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Firetree Ltd. company nor Conard House company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Conard House company nor Firetree Ltd. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Conard House nor Firetree Ltd. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Conard House company nor Firetree Ltd. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Conard House company employs more people globally than Firetree Ltd. company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Conard House nor Firetree Ltd. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Conard House nor Firetree Ltd. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Conard House nor Firetree Ltd. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Conard House nor Firetree Ltd. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Conard House nor Firetree Ltd. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Conard House nor Firetree Ltd. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.