Comparison Overview

CON-WAY INC

VS

Pilbara Rail Maintenance

CON-WAY INC

None
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

XPO Logistics, Inc. (NYSE: XPO) is a top ten global logistics provider of cutting-edge supply chain solutions to the most successful companies in the world. The company operates as a highly integrated network of people, technology and physical assets in 32 countries, with 1,540 locations and approximately 100,000 employees. XPO uses its network to help more than 50,000 customers manage their goods most efficiently throughout their supply chains.

NAICS: 3365
NAICS Definition: Railroad Rolling Stock Manufacturing
Employees: 8
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Pilbara Rail Maintenance

2564 Seabrook Cres, Karratha Industrial Estate, Western Australia, 6714, AU
Last Update: 2025-11-27

Pilbara Rail Maintenance (PRM) is a 100% Australian owned and operated business delivering safe and cost-effective rail construction, maintenance and civil solutions for mining and civil companies and contractors in Australia. We are one of the largest privately-owned rail companies in Australia and our management team has over 50 years of combined experience in the rail industry. We have an extensive fleet of top of the line specialist rail machinery (we have the largest fleet of bespoke Liebherr Hi-rail equipment in Australia) and civil equipment and an experienced workforce capable of delivering complex projects. We take pride in working closely with our clients to ensure we deliver quality, on-time results.

NAICS: 336
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 59
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
CON-WAY INC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pilbara-rail-maintenance.jpeg
Pilbara Rail Maintenance
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
CON-WAY INC
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Pilbara Rail Maintenance
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Railroad Equipment Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CON-WAY INC in 2025.

Incidents vs Railroad Equipment Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Pilbara Rail Maintenance in 2025.

Incident History — CON-WAY INC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CON-WAY INC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Pilbara Rail Maintenance (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Pilbara Rail Maintenance cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
CON-WAY INC
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pilbara-rail-maintenance.jpeg
Pilbara Rail Maintenance
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

CON-WAY INC company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Pilbara Rail Maintenance company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Pilbara Rail Maintenance company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to CON-WAY INC company.

In the current year, Pilbara Rail Maintenance company and CON-WAY INC company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Pilbara Rail Maintenance company nor CON-WAY INC company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Pilbara Rail Maintenance company nor CON-WAY INC company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Pilbara Rail Maintenance company nor CON-WAY INC company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither CON-WAY INC company nor Pilbara Rail Maintenance company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither CON-WAY INC nor Pilbara Rail Maintenance holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither CON-WAY INC company nor Pilbara Rail Maintenance company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Pilbara Rail Maintenance company employs more people globally than CON-WAY INC company, reflecting its scale as a Railroad Equipment Manufacturing.

Neither CON-WAY INC nor Pilbara Rail Maintenance holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither CON-WAY INC nor Pilbara Rail Maintenance holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither CON-WAY INC nor Pilbara Rail Maintenance holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither CON-WAY INC nor Pilbara Rail Maintenance holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither CON-WAY INC nor Pilbara Rail Maintenance holds HIPAA certification.

Neither CON-WAY INC nor Pilbara Rail Maintenance holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H