Comparison Overview

Computype

VS

Northern Flags

Computype

2285 West County Road C, St. Paul, MN, 55113, US
Last Update: 2025-12-10
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.computype.com

For nearly 50 years, Computype has been engineering custom labeling solutions to survive any condition, stay secured to any surface, and maintain perfect clarity every step of the way. Our trusted solutions are tailored to your tracking needs, helping you optimize workflows, reduce waste, and maximize efficiency. With our unique blend of experience and expertise, we create labels that perform under pressure, solving even the toughest identification challenges. At Computype, we don’t just provide labels — we solve identification challenges that others can’t.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 141
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Northern Flags

Millshaw, Leeds, England, undefined, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799
http://www.northernflags.com

Northern Flags is jointly owned by it’s UK Management Team and Europe’s largest marketing fabrics supplier Faber Vlaggen. This partnership allows our clients in UK and Ireland to capitalise on the group’s production scale and expertise while benefiting from market leading account management and efficiency. The combined group employs over 700 people with high capacity production hubs in Thailand, Poland, France and Holland supplemented by smaller facilities here in the UK for clients requiring rapid turnaround when on tight deadlines. We specialise in just in time production for many of the world’s largest companies, from multinational brands, Europe’s largest print management operations; Advertising Agencies and Sports Management Companies - We have been responsible for delivering branding and event marketing for major events such as Euro 2012; Olympic and Commonwealth Games and races from small schools to major marathons. No client is too small and no event is too big. Northern flags is recognised as a leader in Retail POS; Fabric Banners; Barrier Scrim; Banners; Pop out Banners; Pull up Cartridge Systems; Civic Furniture branding; Environmental PVC Replacement; Automotive Display; Feather Flags; Festival Flags; Sail Flags; Aventos Flag Systems and Flag Poles and Display systems. We are trusted by some of the greatest events in the world and have recently been chosen to provide the city dressing for the Euro 2012 Football championships.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 25
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/computype.jpeg
Computype
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/northern-flags.jpeg
Northern Flags
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Computype
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Northern Flags
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Computype in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Northern Flags in 2025.

Incident History — Computype (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Computype cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Northern Flags (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Northern Flags cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/computype.jpeg
Computype
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/northern-flags.jpeg
Northern Flags
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Computype company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Northern Flags company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Northern Flags company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Computype company.

In the current year, Northern Flags company and Computype company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Northern Flags company nor Computype company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Northern Flags company nor Computype company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Northern Flags company nor Computype company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Computype company nor Northern Flags company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Computype nor Northern Flags holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Computype company nor Northern Flags company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Computype company employs more people globally than Northern Flags company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Computype nor Northern Flags holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Computype nor Northern Flags holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Computype nor Northern Flags holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Computype nor Northern Flags holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Computype nor Northern Flags holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Computype nor Northern Flags holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References