Comparison Overview

CompuMail Inc.

VS

Shirtworks

CompuMail Inc.

4057 Port Chicago Highway, Suite 300, Concord, California, US, 94520
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

CompuMail cultivates partnerships with our clients to ensure that they receive the best results, under the highest level of data security, at the most competitive price. We provide physical and digital communication solutions, with a real-time portal to meet your management and oversight needs. Technology changes, business changes, but our commitment to service doesn’t. Contact us today and find out why we'll never stop exploring ways to improve our service and solution offerings for you.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 52
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Shirtworks

Ashville Way, Oxford, OX4 6TU, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-12
Between 750 and 799

Shirtworks are a t-shirt printing specialist proud to deliver a fast and affordable screenprinting and embroidery service for personalised clothing. Our range is by no means limited to T-Shirts and we print onto just about any type of garment. We have extensive experience in the industry and been established over 30 years. We are A living wage employer and Global Organic Textile Standard (GOTS) printer and embroidery certified

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 14
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/compumail.jpeg
CompuMail Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/shirtworks-ltd.jpeg
Shirtworks
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
CompuMail Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Shirtworks
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CompuMail Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Shirtworks in 2025.

Incident History — CompuMail Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CompuMail Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Shirtworks (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Shirtworks cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/compumail.jpeg
CompuMail Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/shirtworks-ltd.jpeg
Shirtworks
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both CompuMail Inc. company and Shirtworks company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Shirtworks company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to CompuMail Inc. company.

In the current year, Shirtworks company and CompuMail Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Shirtworks company nor CompuMail Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Shirtworks company nor CompuMail Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Shirtworks company nor CompuMail Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither CompuMail Inc. company nor Shirtworks company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither CompuMail Inc. nor Shirtworks holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither CompuMail Inc. company nor Shirtworks company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

CompuMail Inc. company employs more people globally than Shirtworks company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither CompuMail Inc. nor Shirtworks holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither CompuMail Inc. nor Shirtworks holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither CompuMail Inc. nor Shirtworks holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither CompuMail Inc. nor Shirtworks holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither CompuMail Inc. nor Shirtworks holds HIPAA certification.

Neither CompuMail Inc. nor Shirtworks holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N