Comparison Overview

Compass Recovery Center

VS

Green Country Behavioral Health Services

Compass Recovery Center

None
Last Update: 2026-01-16

RECOVERY BEGINS TODAY Arizona rehab for substance abuse, gambling addiction, mental health, and co-occurring disorders. Compass Recovery Center, located in the heart of Prescott, Arizona, is a small, family-owned haven of healing that stands out in the world of addiction and mental health treatment. With over a decade of experience, we are dedicated to providing individualized care and support to help you navigate the challenging journey towards recovery. Our commitment to your holistic well-being extends beyond therapeutic approaches. Our specialized programs address substance abuse and gambling addiction and benefit from individual and group therapy, psychiatric services, family communication, financial counseling, and 12-Step integration. From nutritionist support for physical well-being to job development empowering your reintegration into the workforce, and life skills equipping you for daily independence, we ensure a multifaceted approach to your recovery. At Compass, we believe in guiding you toward long-term recovery with personalized care and comprehensive support.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Green Country Behavioral Health Services

619 N. Main St., None, Muskogee, OK, US, 74403
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

We are a private, non-profit Certified Community Behavioral Health Clinic (CCBHC) in Muskogee, Oklahoma, providing comprehensive outpatient and crisis services to individuals of all ages. We offer mental health and substance use disorder services for adults and children, including Medication Assisted Treatment for adults. GCBHS is the designated Health Home for children and adults in Muskogee and McIntosh Counties as well as a NARCAN hub for Muskogee County. No one is denied services because of inability to pay. Simply put, we are caring people, caring for others.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 89
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/compass-recovery-center.jpeg
Compass Recovery Center
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/green-country-behavioral-health-services.jpeg
Green Country Behavioral Health Services
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Compass Recovery Center
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Green Country Behavioral Health Services
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Compass Recovery Center in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Green Country Behavioral Health Services in 2026.

Incident History — Compass Recovery Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Compass Recovery Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Green Country Behavioral Health Services (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Green Country Behavioral Health Services cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/compass-recovery-center.jpeg
Compass Recovery Center
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/green-country-behavioral-health-services.jpeg
Green Country Behavioral Health Services
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Green Country Behavioral Health Services company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Compass Recovery Center company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Green Country Behavioral Health Services company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Compass Recovery Center company.

In the current year, Green Country Behavioral Health Services company and Compass Recovery Center company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Green Country Behavioral Health Services company nor Compass Recovery Center company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Green Country Behavioral Health Services company nor Compass Recovery Center company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Green Country Behavioral Health Services company nor Compass Recovery Center company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Compass Recovery Center company nor Green Country Behavioral Health Services company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Compass Recovery Center nor Green Country Behavioral Health Services holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Compass Recovery Center company nor Green Country Behavioral Health Services company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Green Country Behavioral Health Services company employs more people globally than Compass Recovery Center company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Compass Recovery Center nor Green Country Behavioral Health Services holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Compass Recovery Center nor Green Country Behavioral Health Services holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Compass Recovery Center nor Green Country Behavioral Health Services holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Compass Recovery Center nor Green Country Behavioral Health Services holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Compass Recovery Center nor Green Country Behavioral Health Services holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Compass Recovery Center nor Green Country Behavioral Health Services holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N