Comparison Overview

Compass Health Systems, PA

VS

The Relational Center

Compass Health Systems, PA

1065 NE 125th St, North Miami, 33161, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

Medical PracticeCompass Health Systems, P.A. was founded in July, 1990 by Scott D. Segal, M.D., a double Board Certified Psychiatrist, when he opened the first office in Miami Beach, Florida. Since then, Compass Health Systems has grown to cover the tri-county area in South Florida (Boynton Beach, Ft. Lauderdale, Pembroke Pines, North Miami, and Kendall), Charleston, South Carolina, Denver, Colorado, Colorado Springs, Colorado, and Loveland, Colorado. Each of our 9 offices features a multi-disciplinary team built around at least 1 Board-Certified Psychiatrist. Our teams consist of Primary Care Physicians, Nurse Practitioners, Psychologists, Clinical Social Workers, Mental Health Therapists, Family and Marriage Therapists and Certified Addiction Professionals. Continuum of care is ensured by our affiliation with 12 inpatient facilities, our in-house pharmacy, MedzDirect Pharmacy, which offers free delivery services and specializes in compound medications, our Heroin/Opioid Treatment Center, Golden Glades Treatment Center, and our continued commitment to the advancement of treatments in the arena of CNS and women's health through our sister company Segal Trials.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 132
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

The Relational Center

2717 South Robertson Blvd., Los Angeles, CA, 90034, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22

The Relational Center is a 501c3 nonprofit community organization. Our mission is to lead a shift to a culture that values empathy, diversity, and interdependence. We envision a world in which communities collaborate to practice mindful compassion, mutual support, and civic engagement. We exist to promote the essential importance of relationships. When we value our connections with others and with the environment, we create the necessary conditions for health and sustainability. Our work promotes personal, interpersonal, and social practices that help people build strong, resilient relationships. There are two main programs at The Relational Center: mental health services and professional development for clinicians. We offer affordable psychotherapy to marginalized groups, individuals, couples, families, and other intimate relationship networks. We primarily serve the Los Angeles area and starting in Summer of 2020 we also provide services throughout California. We currently serve approximately 450 clients. Our 3-year clinical training and practicum program provides professional development support for over 40 aspiring psychotherapists and social workers. We train practitioners to work in a Relational Gestalt counseling model that is designed to be trauma responsive and grounded in social justice values. Graduates of our program are not only ready to provide high-quality mental health services, but they are also prepared to be values-based leaders in other organizations.

NAICS: 621
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 56
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/compass-health-systems-pa.jpeg
Compass Health Systems, PA
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-relational-center.jpeg
The Relational Center
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Compass Health Systems, PA
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
The Relational Center
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Compass Health Systems, PA in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Relational Center in 2026.

Incident History — Compass Health Systems, PA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Compass Health Systems, PA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — The Relational Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Relational Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/compass-health-systems-pa.jpeg
Compass Health Systems, PA
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-relational-center.jpeg
The Relational Center
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Compass Health Systems, PA company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to The Relational Center company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, The Relational Center company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Compass Health Systems, PA company.

In the current year, The Relational Center company and Compass Health Systems, PA company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither The Relational Center company nor Compass Health Systems, PA company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither The Relational Center company nor Compass Health Systems, PA company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither The Relational Center company nor Compass Health Systems, PA company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Compass Health Systems, PA company nor The Relational Center company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Compass Health Systems, PA nor The Relational Center holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Compass Health Systems, PA company nor The Relational Center company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Compass Health Systems, PA company employs more people globally than The Relational Center company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Compass Health Systems, PA nor The Relational Center holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Compass Health Systems, PA nor The Relational Center holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Compass Health Systems, PA nor The Relational Center holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Compass Health Systems, PA nor The Relational Center holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Compass Health Systems, PA nor The Relational Center holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Compass Health Systems, PA nor The Relational Center holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N