Comparison Overview

Compass Group USA

VS

Café de Coral Holdings Limited 大家樂集團

Compass Group USA

2400 Yorkmont Road, None, Charlotte, North Carolina, US, 28217
Last Update: 2025-11-27

Compass Group is redefining the food and facility services landscape with innovation and passion through the lens of what’s next. Serving premier healthcare systems, respected educational institutions, world-renowned cultural centers, popular sporting and entertainment venues, and Fortune 500 organizations, Compass Group always finds a way to deliver excellence in nearly any vertical. Ranked No. 1 by industry peers on Fortune’s 2023 list of World’s Most Admired Companies, Compass has also earned a spot on Newsweek’s 2023 lists of America’s Greatest Workplaces for Diversity and America’s Most Trustworthy Companies and is among the Top 50 Companies Changing the World according to Fortune. Compass Careers Site - JOIN US! www.compassgroupcareers.com Compass USA Facebook: @compassgroupusa Compass USA Instagram: @compassgroupusa

NAICS: 722
NAICS Definition: Food Services and Drinking Places
Employees: 63,626
Subsidiaries: 23
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Café de Coral Holdings Limited 大家樂集團

Last Update: 2025-11-23
Between 750 and 799

Incorporated in 1968 and listed on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange in July 1986, Café de Coral Group (SEHK: 0341) is one of Asia’s largest publicly-listed restaurant and catering groups. With deep roots in Hong Kong, the Group has established its position as a market leader in the fast food industry over the past 50 years. Today, our businesses include quick service restaurants, casual dining chains, institutional catering and food processing. The Group operates over 470 dining outlets – as well as 4 ISO-certified food processing plants – in Hong Kong and Mainland China. Placing a high priority on sustainable development and operations, we have been a constituent member of the Hang Seng Corporate Sustainability Benchmark Index since 2015.

NAICS: 722
NAICS Definition: Food Services and Drinking Places
Employees: 10,001
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/compass-group-north-america.jpeg
Compass Group USA
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cafe-de-coral.jpeg
Café de Coral Holdings Limited 大家樂集團
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Compass Group USA
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Café de Coral Holdings Limited 大家樂集團
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Compass Group USA in 2025.

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Café de Coral Holdings Limited 大家樂集團 in 2025.

Incident History — Compass Group USA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Compass Group USA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Café de Coral Holdings Limited 大家樂集團 (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Café de Coral Holdings Limited 大家樂集團 cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/compass-group-north-america.jpeg
Compass Group USA
Incidents

Date Detected: 2/2015
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Malicious Software
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cafe-de-coral.jpeg
Café de Coral Holdings Limited 大家樂集團
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Compass Group USA company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Café de Coral Holdings Limited 大家樂集團 company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Compass Group USA company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Café de Coral Holdings Limited 大家樂集團 company has not reported any.

In the current year, Café de Coral Holdings Limited 大家樂集團 company and Compass Group USA company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Café de Coral Holdings Limited 大家樂集團 company nor Compass Group USA company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Café de Coral Holdings Limited 大家樂集團 company nor Compass Group USA company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Compass Group USA company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Café de Coral Holdings Limited 大家樂集團 company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Compass Group USA company nor Café de Coral Holdings Limited 大家樂集團 company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Compass Group USA nor Café de Coral Holdings Limited 大家樂集團 holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Compass Group USA company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Café de Coral Holdings Limited 大家樂集團 company.

Compass Group USA company employs more people globally than Café de Coral Holdings Limited 大家樂集團 company, reflecting its scale as a Food and Beverage Services.

Neither Compass Group USA nor Café de Coral Holdings Limited 大家樂集團 holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Compass Group USA nor Café de Coral Holdings Limited 大家樂集團 holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Compass Group USA nor Café de Coral Holdings Limited 大家樂集團 holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Compass Group USA nor Café de Coral Holdings Limited 大家樂集團 holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Compass Group USA nor Café de Coral Holdings Limited 大家樂集團 holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Compass Group USA nor Café de Coral Holdings Limited 大家樂集團 holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H