Comparison Overview

Compass Advocacy

VS

Seneca Nation Group

Compass Advocacy

48 Maryland Ave, Annapolis, Maryland, 21401, US
Last Update: 2025-12-10
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.compassadvocacy.com/

Founded in 2018 by preeminent lobbyist Hannah Garagiola, Compass Advocacy is headquartered in the heart of Annapolis. In addition, we operate a government relations and law office in downtown Rockville, Maryland. We also advocate in Dover, Delaware. Our team is comprised of passionate lobbyists, consultants, creatives, attorneys, and problem-solvers ready to advocate for our clients. Compass Advocacy is comprised of three separate and distinct businesses to holistically navigate challenging client issues in the government relations, public relations, and the legal arena. Each business can work independently or synergistically to meet a client’s needs. Oftentimes, a client uses the services of all three businesses to accomplish their objectives. We work smartly, efficiently and with energy, passion, and dedication.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 13
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Seneca Nation Group

90 Ohi Way, Salamanca, New York, US, 14779
Last Update: 2025-12-13
Between 750 and 799
https://senecanationgroup.com/

The Seneca Nation Group (SNG) is the federal government contracting business of Seneca Holdings, which is wholly owned by the Seneca Nation. We meet the mission-critical needs of our Federal Civilian, Defense, and Intelligence Community customers across a variety of domains. Our portfolio is comprised of multiple companies that participate in the Small Business Administration 8(a) program. It is our mission to improve the economy of the Seneca Nation by providing products and services that support the critical missions of our federal government customers. SNG generates over $270 million in annual revenue from diverse business enterprises focused in both commercial and government markets that directly supports over 8,500 Seneca shareholders. The financial stability and support from the Seneca Nation enables us to confidently assert our ability to meet customer requirements in ways not normally available from small businesses.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 383
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/compass-gr-partners.jpeg
Compass Advocacy
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/seneca-nation-group.jpeg
Seneca Nation Group
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Compass Advocacy
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Seneca Nation Group
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Relations Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Compass Advocacy in 2025.

Incidents vs Government Relations Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Seneca Nation Group in 2025.

Incident History — Compass Advocacy (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Compass Advocacy cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Seneca Nation Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Seneca Nation Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/compass-gr-partners.jpeg
Compass Advocacy
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/seneca-nation-group.jpeg
Seneca Nation Group
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Seneca Nation Group company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Compass Advocacy company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Seneca Nation Group company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Compass Advocacy company.

In the current year, Seneca Nation Group company and Compass Advocacy company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Seneca Nation Group company nor Compass Advocacy company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Seneca Nation Group company nor Compass Advocacy company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Seneca Nation Group company nor Compass Advocacy company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Compass Advocacy company nor Seneca Nation Group company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Compass Advocacy nor Seneca Nation Group holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Compass Advocacy company nor Seneca Nation Group company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Seneca Nation Group company employs more people globally than Compass Advocacy company, reflecting its scale as a Government Relations.

Neither Compass Advocacy nor Seneca Nation Group holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Compass Advocacy nor Seneca Nation Group holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Compass Advocacy nor Seneca Nation Group holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Compass Advocacy nor Seneca Nation Group holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Compass Advocacy nor Seneca Nation Group holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Compass Advocacy nor Seneca Nation Group holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References